General Surgery Coding Alert

Coding Basics:

Follow 3 Rules to Capture Separate E/M Pay

Avoid modifier 25 scrutiny with proper 'separately identifiable' documentation.

Reporting a separate E/M every time your surgeon performs a procedure is asking for an audit. Unlock the secrets to legitimate pay for separately identifiable E/M services using modifier 25 (Significant, separately identifiable evaluation and management service by the same physician on the same day of the procedure or other service) with these three guidelines.

1. Ensure Your General Surgeon Performed a Separate Service

You should use modifier 25 when your surgeon's documentation supports that he performed an E/M service that was significant and separately identifiable from the work included in another service or procedure.

Tip: "Look at the documentation and cross out anything that is directly related to the procedure performed," says Judith L. Blaszczyk RN, CPC, ACS-PM, compliance auditor with ACE consulting in Leawood, Kan. "Look then at the remaining documentation to determine if it is indeed significant, separately identifiable and medically necessary."

Official guidance: CPT's Appendix A states that a significant and separately identifiable service "is defined or substantiated by documentation that satisfies the relevant criteria for the respective E/M service to be reported."

Remember: You can only consider reporting modifier 25 when coding an E/M service. If the procedures you're reporting don't fall under E/M services, it's possible the encounter qualifies for another modifier instead.

Example: The surgeon sees an established patient for a scheduled internal hemorrhoidectomy. She ligates several hemorrhoids using rubber bands. After the hemorrhoidectomy, the patient brings up a new problem, such as a painful abdominal bulge near the umbilicus. Therefore, your surgeon performs an examination, discusses the problem with the patient, and schedules a follow-up appointment for a hernia repair.

Because the hernia is a new problem, you can separately report the hemorrhoidectomy and the E/M service. You would code 46221 (Hemorrhoidectomy; internal, by rubber band ligation[s]) and the appropriate E/M code, such as 99213 (Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of an established patient ...) with modifier 25 appended. If that same patient had had only the hemorrhoid examination and no separate E/M service, then you would not bill a separate office visit code.

Bottom line: Using modifier 25 is "essentially telling the insurance company: 'During this visit I determined XYZ needed to be done and I happened to have time to do it that day.' If you can't say this (or something like it) then the E/M service shouldn't be billed," says Suzan Berman CPC, CEMC, CEDC, senior manager of coding education and documentation compliance, in the Physician Services Division at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

2. Don't Confuse Modifiers 25 and 57

The difference between 25 and modifier 57 (Decision for surgery) is a common point of confusion, because both involve your surgeon performing a procedure and distinct E/M service for the same patient on the same day.

The quickest distinction is that you would use 25 for a distinct E/M with a minor procedure, and 57 for a distinct E/M with a major follow-up procedure.

How it works: You should only use modifier 25 with procedures that have a 0- or 10-day global period, Berman explains. These kinds of procedures are what Medicare defines as "minor." In contrast, you'll use modifier 57 for procedureswith a 90-day global period. Note, however, that some payers are now requesting 57 on 10-day globals, according to Torrix, so check with your individual payers.

Watch out: Some coders view modifier 25 as a "magic bullet" and they always add a 25 modifier to E/Ms done on the same day as a procedure because that is the only way they can get them paid. Don't fall into that trap. "Any practice that applies modifier 25 indiscriminately to their E/Ms will be an outlier to other practices in the volume of claims billed with modifier 25and will be sending up red flags," Blaszczyk says.

3. Stop Omitting 25 Because of Same Dx

Proper modifier 25 use does not require a different diagnosis code. In fact, the presence of different diagnosis codes attached to the E/M and the procedure does not necessarily support a separately reportable E/M service.

"The guidelines changed years ago that you do not need to have a different diagnosis to use modifier 25," says Jetton Torrix, CCS-P, CPC-H, course director of Knowledge Source Seminars in North Port, Fla. and Cross Country Education instructor. "But it still seems to be easier to get paid if the diagnoses are different," she adds.

Go to the source: The information about modifier 25 in the CPT manual clearly indicates that you do not have to have two different diagnosis codes to use the modifier. The CPT manual states: "The E/M service may be prompted by the symptom or condition for which the procedure and/or service was provided.

As such, different diagnoses are not required for reporting of the E/M services on the same date."

How it works: "The proof [of separately reportable services] is in the documentation of the E/M service," Berman says.

Your doctor's documentation should clearly establish that the visit's purpose was not to perform the procedure. If your eceive denials on modifier 25 claims simply because you use the same diagnosis code for the E/M and the procedure, you should appeal assuming your surgeon's documentation supports reporting separate services.

Other Articles in this issue of

General Surgery Coding Alert

View All