Health Information Compliance Alert
TEXAS MAN, ACCUSED OF DUI, LEARNS NOT TO MESS WITH HIPAA
PDF
Clayton Harper Tapp was involved in a motorcycle accident and was taken to Memorial Hermann Hospital. After smelling alcohol on Tapp's breath, a police officer obtained a grand jury subpoena to obtain his blood-alcohol test results - yet there was no criminal proceeding pending against him at the time the subpoena was issued.
Tapp pleaded guilty to a DUI misdemeanor offense after filing a motion in trail court to suppress his blood test results. Later, he appealed the conviction, arguing that the State improperly obtained his blood test results by failing to comply with the grand jury subpoena process, specifically arguing that the results were admitted in violation of his privacy rights under HIPAA, and that the use of a grand jury subpoena to obtain the results constituted an unreasonable search and seizure.
"In this case, compliance with [HIPAA's privacy rule] regulations was not yet required," ruled Judge Paul Murphy while referring to the April 14, 2003 privacy rule compliance deadline. Tapp was charged with the DUI Nov. 30, 2001.
"Consequently, appellant's preemption argument is without merit in that any compliance with the regulations was not even mandated," he added. Murphy said since HIPAA's privacy rule regulations were still in the "pre-enforcement stage" at the time of his conviction, the court was compelled to follow existing case law.
As for Tapp's claim of unreasonable search and seizure, Murphy ruled that the State's Bill of Rights holds that appellants lack standing to assert that using a grand jury subpoena to obtain his blood results constitutes unreasonable search and seizure. The appellant "does not have a Fourth Amendment reasonable expectation of privacy that protects blood-alcohol test results from tests taken by hospital personnel solely for medical purposes after a traffic accident," he noted in the court opinion.
Editor's Note: To read the court opinion, go to www.14th
coa.courts.state.tx.us/opinions/HTMLOpinion.asp?OpinionID=78292.
Health Information Compliance Alert
- Transactions:
TCS TESTING PLAN VITAL TO ENSURE YOUR BUSINESS' SURVIVAL
4 Tips To Help Avoid Enforcement Watchdogs And Lost Revenues
If you haven't begun [...] - Training Tips:
RESOLVING COMPLAINTS STARTS WITH YOUR FRONTLINE
4 Essential Tips To Prepare Your Frontline Staff
Frontline staffers may be one of your [...] - Privacy:
For Mental Health Care, Let Cooler Heads Prevail With Patient Notes
A 3-Step Process To HIPAA-Compliant Psychotherapy
While HIPAA doesn't require providers who offer mental health services [...] - The Third Degree:
READER QUESTIONS ANSWERED
Thanks, HICA readers! We've received several great HIPAA questions this month. Now, thanks to a [...] - Privacy:
Eckerd Has Key To Compliance On The Cheap
Protecting patient privacy doesn't have to be either prohibitively expensive or mind-numbingly complex. At least, [...] - Privacy:
KEEP PHI STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL
Although it should be painfully obvious by now to all covered entities that protected health [...] - SAMPLE DOCUMENT:
Confidentiality and Security Agreement - HIPAA Alert:
Avoid HIPAA Scams! How To Smell A 'HIPAA-Certified' Rat
The Tell-Tale Signs of HIPAA Scammers - And How To Combat Them
From companies offering "certified" [...] - Notices of Privacy Practices:
OHCAs AND NOTICES OF PRIVACY PRACTICES: A CONFUSING COMBO
How OHCAs Can Slay The NPP Beast Knowing how to address HIPAA's notice of privacy [...] - Health Information News:
TEXAS MAN, ACCUSED OF DUI, LEARNS NOT TO MESS WITH HIPAA
Clayton Harper Tapp was involved in a motorcycle accident and was taken to Memorial Hermann [...] - Sample Document:
GIVE PATIENTS PREFERENCES WITH PHONE MESSAGES
The benefits of proper and efficient communication with your patients is twofold: It's essential to [...] - HIPAA Study:
ARE YOU TRANSMITTING PHI IN YOUR E-MAIL?
A recent study reveals that many healthcare organizations are unwittingly transmitting protected health information via [...]