Home Health & Hospice Week

HIPAA:

Provider Pays $865,500 Fine For HIPAA-Violating Peek

You don't need celebrity patients to learn from this HIPAA mistake. If you knew Brad Pitt was getting medical treatment from your home care organization, would you peek at his files? How about your ex-husband's new wife? Or your estranged sister? No matter whose records you're reviewing, it's illegal to take that peek unless you have a medically necessary reason to do so. That was a very expensive lesson that the University of California at Los Angeles Health System (UCLAHS) learned recently after agreeing to settle potential violations of the HIPAA rule for $865,500. At issue: When two celebrity patients received care at the hospital, staff members at the facility "repeatedly and without permissible reason" looked at the patients' electronic PHI. After the celebrities complained, it was revealed that between 2005 and 2008, "unauthorized employees repeatedly looked at the electronic protected health information of numerous other UCLAHS patients," a Health [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Home Health & Hospice Week

View All