Home Health & Hospice Week

Industry Notes:

CERT Slip Will Bring You

Don't let a non-response mar your record. If you fail to respond quickly to a record request from a CERT contractor, don't be surprised if you are almost immediately harassed.
 
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services wants its payment error rate information, and it's not kidding around. CMS took over the Medicare payment error rate report from the HHS Office of Inspector General last year, and got a lower response rate to medical record requests than the OIG had been getting (see Eli's HCW, Vol. XII, No. 43, p. 341).
 
Then, when CMS excluded the so-called "non-responders," from its error rate figures, lawmakers harshly criticized the tactics and resulting low error rate. This year, CMS appears to be set on getting those records to complete its error rate report due in November for calendar year 2003.
 
The contractors computing the Comprehensive Error Rate Testing already send out letters on behalf of the OIG when providers fail to respond to a medical record request.
 
Now CMS is requiring carriers and intermediaries to contact "tardy" providers as soon as 20 days after the CERT contractor's initial request. By 30 days after the CERT request, carriers and intermediaries must contact non-responding providers, says CMS Trans-mittal No. 67 dated April 2.

 "We believe that having [contractors] contact non-responding providers will help lower the error rate significantly," CMS says in the One-Time Notice. CMS encourages carriers and intermediaries to use phone calls rather than letters or faxes, but doesn't require it.
 
Contractors may contact "third-party provid-ers" to send in relevant records, but don't have to, CMS adds in the transmittal.
 
If the CERT contractor hasn't received the requested record by 10 days after the contact, the carrier or intermediary will refer the "recalcitrant" provider to regional OIG staff, the transmittal says. What the OIG will do with the information is unclear.
 
What is clear is that before providers have a chance to catch their breath and understand the CERT record request, they could rack up an OIG referral, critics charge.
 
And CMS and its contractors have done a poor job of explaining to providers why CERT records are needed, who the contractors are and that the requests are legitimate, critics add. And now providers are being punished for that incompetence, they claim.   Regional home health intermediary Pal-metto GBA will implement its new local coverage decision (LCD) on Hospice Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders April 28, but it has made a compromise. After receiving comments on the LCD, Palmetto has changed the level of activity limitation supporting the six-month prognosis from Functional Assessment Staging Scale level 7c to FAST stage 7 and above, Palmetto says in a posting to its Web site.
 
The RHHI didn't include any other dementias in the LCD because [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more