Lawsuits:
Court Upholds $1.8 Million Judgment Against HHA Owner
Published on Thu Feb 17, 2005
Former MedShares exec's cost report mistakes add up quickly under False Claims Act.
If you're one of the many home health agencies convinced that your cost report is a low priority these days, a recent court decision may change your mind.
Even though a home health agency owner received no money directly from an expense recorded on a cost report, he is still on the hook for False Claims Act charges, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals said in a decision issued March 10.
"The allowable/unallowable cost rules still apply," Burtonsville, MD-based health care attorney Elizabeth Hogue reminds HHAs. "The industry may be in for some surprises with regard to cost reports as the basis for allegations of false claims."
In June 1993 Stephen Winters bought Trevecca Home Health Services Inc., a Medicare-certified HHA in the Nashville, TN area, from A+ Homecare, according to U.S. v. Medshares Management Group Inc. (No. 02-6545). Winters owned MMGI and other related Medshares units.
The problem started when Winters decided to make a pension plan contribution for Trevecca for the entire fiscal year 1993 period, even though he bought the agency only in the last month of that year, according to the decision.
A+ Homecare had 400 employees on its payroll for the period in question, but not all of those were Trevecca employees. In fact, when Winters bought Trevecca, the HHA had only 57 employees.
MMGI tried to get the employee numbers from A+ Homecare but couldn't, it said. But Winters directed MMGI employees to estimate a pension contribution onthe larger number of employees anyway, without knowing the number of employees who worked for Trevecca that year or who qualified for the MMGI pension plan.
Trevecca submitted the cost on its interim rate report in 1993, and the pension cost took the agency from an overpayment (owing money back to Medicare) to an underpayment (receiving money from Medicare) on the IRR. Then, Trevecca submitted the cost on its 1995 cost report, the court says.
Intermediary Palmetto GBA disallowed the cost, but Winters, MMGI and Trevecca got hit with a False Claims Act suit anyway. A+ Homecare had filed a qui tam suit and the government took it up.
Because MMGI and Trevecca went into bankruptcy, the suit proceeded against Winters. It charged Winters with knowingly submitting a false pension expense of about $527,000 on the IRR, knowingly submitting a false pension expense of nearly $621,000 on the cost report, and providing false information to Palmetto during an audit.
The district court granted summary judgment on the audit charge, but in 2002, a jury found Winters guilty of the other FCA charges. The jury awarded $1.1 million in damages, but the district court reduced the damages to the $602,000 amount the government requested. Thanks to [...]
