Internal Medicine Coding Alert
Don't Risk E/M Payment When Prescribing Drugs
PDF
Question: The internist was going to prescribe Methotrexate and Remicade, which would require intensive monitoring for toxicity. She documented her reasons and her discussion with the patient concerning this treatment option. Then, after additional discussion and decision-making, the physician decided to use a different drug, which doesn't require intensive monitoring for toxicity. Can we still choose the high-management option from the Table of Risk based on the previous? Answer: There is no set definition for the Table of Risk's intensive monitoring for toxicity option, according to coding experts. In many cases, the decision regarding which level of prescription drug management to select varies among practices, chart reviewers and payers. Yet, in your situation, your safest choice - especially to protect against denials or an audit - would be to document and bill for the moderate management option.
Vermont Subscriber
Reason: Your physician chose not to go with the higher-risk drug, so the monitoring of toxicity never occurred. Therefore, you cannot have a risk level for something your physician didn't do.
Internal Medicine Coding Alert
- Don't Skip a Beat When You Report 93015-93018
Here's why 'component coding' is key If you report cardiovascular stress tests (93015-93018), make sure [...] - You Be the Coder:
Nursing Home Discharge
Question: How should we bill for a nursing home discharge after the patient has died? [...] - News You Can Use:
What the 2005 Fee Schedule Means for IM Offices
Good news: Your internist won't see the expected 3.3 percent pay cut This year, your [...] - Clip and Save:
Skip Modifiers When You Report Stress Tests
Let the CPT definitions be your guide to component coding If you're tempted to attach modifier [...] - Fee Schedule Update:
How Coders Can Welcome 'New' Medicare Visits
We've got the scoop on the latest guidelines for preventive care and EKGs By now [...] - What You Need to End Your Biopsy-Shaving Confusion
Test yourself on everyday biopsy and excision dilemmas Even though your internist documented a "punch [...] - Reader Questions:
2nd-Degree Burn Code Is a 1st-Degree Mistake
Question: The physician diagnosed a patient with a second-degree burn on her right palm (944.25). [...] - Reader Questions:
Expect Different Policies for Oximetry Coverage
Question: Under what circumstances will insurers reimburse 94760? Can we report this code with other [...] - Reader Questions:
Don't Risk E/M Payment When Prescribing Drugs
Question: The internist was going to prescribe Methotrexate and Remicade, which would require intensive monitoring [...] - Reader Questions:
When CPR May Equal Critical Care
Question: Can the internist charge 92950 (Cardiopulmonary resuscitation [e.g., in cardiac arrest]) for running the [...] - Reader Questions:
Count the Number of Immunotherapy Injections
Question: When should I report 95115 instead of 95117? What other codes are applicable?
Tennessee Subscriber
Answer: [...] - Reader Questions:
Understand Teaching Physician Exceptions
Question: My internist works at a teaching hospital, and I've heard about a "primary-care exception." [...] - Are You Ready to End Your E/M-Guideline Confusion? We Can Help
Use CMS' responses to our questions to report correct E/M levels Like many coders, you've [...] - You Be the Expert:
Should You Factor Patient's Status?
Question: During an office visit, my doctor performed an expanded problem-focused history, a problem-focused examination, [...] - Bonus Question:
Improve Your Prescription Drug Documentation
Find out what CMS has to say about the management options category Calculating a patient's [...] - Reader Question:
Let the Elements Drive Your History Documentation
Question: The chart that physicians use to select the level of history includes identifiers. For [...]