Internal Medicine Coding Alert
Payers Typically Accept NPP Performing 69210
PDF
Question:
Indiana Subscriber
Answer: There are two questions here, so we'll address them one at a time:
Can we report 69210? With Medicare, you should be able to report 69210 (Removal impacted cerumen [separate procedure], one or both ears) for this visit based on your description. Keep in mind, however, that for Medicare you would report this service under the NPP's national provider identifier (NPI) number.
If you cannot prove the cerumen is impacted, you may want to think twice about reporting 69210. Payers may vary slightly as to what they consider impacted cerumen (380.4) for coding purposes, but the condition is typically marked by earwax blocking a portion of the external auditory canal or the tympanic membrane. This wax is often hard, dry, and painful.
During a 69210 encounter, the provider typically removes the cerumen using one of these instruments: suction, probes forceps, right angle hooks, or wax curettes.
In addition to 69210, the NPP likely provided an E/M service to this patient. Go back and check the encounter notes for E/M evidence; if you do file an E/M along with 69210, be sure to append modifier 25 (Significant, separately identifiable evaluation and management service by the same physician on the same day of the procedure or other service) to the E/M to show that it was a separate service.
Is 69210 for physicians only? It depends on the carrier. As long as it is within the NPP's scope of practice, she has the proper state licensure, and she uses instrumentation to remove impacted cerumen, most insurers will pay for 69210 that an NPP performs.
Best practice: If you are unsure about a payer, check your contract or contact a rep, then file the claim.
Internal Medicine Coding Alert
- Relax Your Medicare Well-Woman Requirements With New CMS Info
Your internist might not need to provide breast exam to report G0101
A new transmittal from [...] - Prove Separate Nature of Service, and Add E/M to Preventive Screening Claims
Two examples show you when issue is related, separate You could be missing out on [...] - Avoid Denials by Separating Rules for Sequential, Concurrent Infusions
Multiple substances mixed in same IV bag mean single infusion codeWhen your internist performs a [...] - Reader Questions:
Remember Modifiers on CLIA-Waived Tests
Question: An established Medicare patient complain-ing of sore throat reported to the internist, who ordered [...] - Reader Questions:
Hematuria Codes Get More Specific in October
Question: An established patient presented to the internist complaining of pain during urination. The internist [...] - Reader Questions:
Coding 'Probable' Dx Will 'Likely' Mean Trouble
Question: A new patient reported to the internist complaining of wheezing and shortness of breath [...] - Reader Questions:
Payers Typically Accept NPP Performing 69210
Question: An established Medicare patient reported to the internist with "painful" wax buildup in her [...] - Reader Questions:
Extend Fever Dx to 5th Digit, or Land in Hot Water
Question: One of our Medicare patients came to us yesterday with a high fever, along [...] - YOU Be the Coder:
Trigger Point Injections for Back Pain
Question: An established patient with a history of back problems reported to the internist complaining [...]