Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement

CODING COACH:

Affect Your Practice's Bottom Line With Nosebleed Repair Smarts

Coders often under-report their epistaxis claims. If you can't differentiate a complex anterior nosebleed repair from a simple one, you're costing your ED nearly $20 per misidentified claim. Further, coders who cannot discern a reportable nosebleed repair encounter from an E/M will subject the practice to upcoding concerns. Check out these basics for each type of nosebleed repair to nail your coding each time. Consider E/M For Non-Active Nosebleeds If a patient reports to the ED with a nosebleed, and the physician stops the bleeding with basic methods, the coder usually chooses an E/M code,confirms LindaMartien, CPC, CPC-H, coding specialist at National Healing Inc. in Boca Raton, Fla. These methods can include minimal attempts at stoppage, including ice or brief, direct pressure. The key to these encounters is that the physician did "not perform a billable procedure, so the E/M is the only way to capture the services the physician [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement

View All