Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement

MODIFIERS:

Get Straight On Modifiers 52 And 53

Don't forego discontinued-procedure pay due to modifier confusion.

When your physician discontinues a procedure, are you certain how to bill for it? If you're wondering when you can bill for stopped procedures--and how to decide between modifiers--you're not alone.

In practice, there's enough overlap between modifiers 52 and 53 to cause continued confusion on how to apply them. Read the following guidance to clear the cobwebs on this tricky distinction. Keep 52 For Unplanned Reductions Modifier 52 (Reduced services) applies when "a service or procedure is partially reduced or eliminated at the physician's discretion," according to CPT. You should use modifier 52 when "services are less than described by the code," adds Pamela J. Biffle, CPC, CCS-P, ACS-DE, director of operations for AAPC e-Learning headquartered in Salt Lake City. "You don't have to plan on services being reduced to use modifier 52. Often the provider may not know until the service has started."

Alternatively: Append modifier 53 (Discontinued procedure) if the physician elects to terminate a surgical or diagnostic procedure "due to extenuating circumstances or those that threaten the well-being of the patient," according to CPT. Generally, however, if the physician plans or expects a reduction in services, or if the physician electively cancels the procedure, modifier 52 is appropriate.

Example: If a descriptor specifies a bilateral procedure but no code describes an equivalent unilateral procedure, and the physician provides the service on one side only, modifier 52 is appropriate. In such a case, you must be certain that there is no designated CPT code to describe the lesser procedure. Unexpected Complications Warrant 53 In contrast, if the physician reduces the service due to unexpected complications that place the patient at unacceptable risk, modifier 53 is appropriate. "The 53 modifier is used when the procedure was started and then is reduced because of extenuating circumstances," says Suzan Hvizdash, CPC, physician educator for the University of Pittsburgh and former AAPC National Advisory Board member. That is, the physician intended to provide the complete service but was unable to do so because of unusual or complicating circumstances that threatened the well-being of the patient.

Example: A physician providing a surgical service may abandon the procedure due to extensive hemorrhaging or adverse reaction to anesthesia. In this case, modifier 53 is appropriate. But if the physician elected to stop the service because of an uncooperative patient, not because of any undue risk of harm to the patient, modifier 52 is a better fit than 53.

Caution: You cannot use modifier 53 unless anesthesia has already been initiated, Biffle says. If the physician cancels a procedure prior to anesthesia, you cannot bill the surgical procedure code even with modifier 53 appended. Instead, if the physician performs and documents a [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.