Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement

Physicians:

Stark II Regs Spell Changes For Doc Recruitment

Prepare to bring contracts into compliance.

In the past, physicians and hospitals have signed separate "income guarantee" deals with new physicians that added up to an understanding that the practice would hire the physician, but the hospital would underwrite her income. But the new Stark II regulations spell changes for these deals.
 
For one thing, hospitals and physicians will have to work together more closely on these arrangements, according to Jack Valancy, a consultant with Valancy Associates in Cleveland Heights, OH. And you can wave goodbye to non-compete clauses for new doctors.

Non-compete clauses have often left new physicians in a tight spot, according to Valancy. The new physician signs an agreement with the local hospital to remain in the geographic area for three years in return for one year of guaranteed income. If the physician leaves the area, she will have to repay the hospital the money it paid her. But the physician's employment agreement with the practice may last only one year.
 
Problem: If the agreement contains a non-compete clause and the practice doesn't renew it, then the physician may be unable to practice in the area in which she's promised to stay.
 
The non-compete clause "puts the new doctor at a disadvantage when renewing the contract," notes Valancy. "The practice could offer this terrible, terrible deal and the young physician was pretty much over a barrel."
 
But from the standpoint of practices, "they bring in a new physician, and he or she may basically walk out the door with a bunch of business," notes attorney Bob Ramsey with Buchanan Ingersoll in Philadelphia. "They in a sense have hurt themselves by recruiting the new physician."
 
Practices may still be able to put in place employment contracts forbidding new physicians from soliciting their existing patients, notes attorney Charles Oppenheim with Foley & Lardner in Los Angeles. It remains to be seen whether such non-solicitation clauses violate the Stark law. Expenses Reined In Under New Regs The biggest change in the new regs is on the expense side, notes Ramsey. Now "there's no real room to pass through anything that's not very specifically incurred related to that incoming doc," he says. In the past, most deals included "reasonable allocations of overhead," adds Ramsey. These deals may have included a pro rata allocation of expenses, so that if a new doctor joined a nine-person group, then one-tenth of the group's expenses would be included in the hospital's income guarantees.
 
But from Medicare's standpoint, letting the hospital cover a chunk of the practice's overhead opened the door for abuses, and appeared too much like a reimbursement for the business the physicians sent to the hospital. Any time a deal between a practice and a hospital includes extra compensation over fair [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement

View All