Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement

QUALITY ASSURANCE :

Does Your Hospital's Peer Review Program Catch Unnecessary Surgeries and Procedures?

Revamping this safety net protects patients and the hospital's reputation and compliance record. Hospitals can sidestep a major patient safety and compliance nightmare: A physician who's been doing procedures that clearly don't meet established medical necessity criteria. That scenario occurred recently at a Baltimore,Maryland hospital where a surgeon stands accused of planting stents in people who didn't need them (see the cover story in the last issue of Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement, Vol. 33, No. 1). "In terms of surgical procedures, the No. 1 safety measure [to help prevent unnecessary procedures] is peer review in hospitals," says attorney Christopher Lucas, in private practice in Camp Hill, Pa. "The hospital has access to the experts and diagnostic data and could evaluate medical necessity, although sometimes the hospital has financial incentives not to look at thatissue too closely." Not only can the bottom line skew the peer review committee's findings or willingness [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement

View All