Modifier Coding Alert
I.D. Separate Sites Before Using 59 for Lesion Excision, Repair
PDF
Question: We billed CPT® codes 12042 and 11420 with modifier 51. I billed the 12042 as the primary procedure because it had higher RVUs (relative value units) and did not append a modifier (it was billable as not a simple closure). The payer is denying it based on a modifier. Any suggestions for how I should resubmit the claim?
Utah Subscriber
Answer: Coding edits bundle 12042 (Repair, intermediate, wounds of neck, hands, feet and/or external genitalia; 2.6 cm to 7.5 cm) and 11420 (Excision, benign lesion including margins, except skin tag [unless listed elsewhere], scalp, neck, hands, feet, genitalia; excised diameter 0.5 cm or less).
The only time you can bill the codes together is when the physician performs the procedures in different anatomic sites and you have clear documentation. Even though 12042 has more RVUs than 11420, 12042 is the column 2 code in the correct coding initiative (CCI), which is a rare situation. Assuming that the repair is a different site from the lesion excision, 12042 would be the primary procedure billed with modifier 59 (Distinct procedural service) appended and then 11420 would be billed as the second line on the claim.
If you try to report both codes for procedures to a single lesion, payers will deny payment because simple closure is included in and you cannot bill an intermediate or complex repair for a lesion of 0.5 cm or less.
Adding a 59 modifier to a closure to the same lesion that had been removed is improper use of the 59 and would be considered fraud since the 59 modifier cannot be supported as a separate site, separate encounter, separate physician, different procedure or surgery, separate incision/excision; separate lesion; or separate injury (or area of injury in extensive injuries) not ordinarily encountered or performed on the same day by the same individual.
Remember: Some payers have replaced modifier 59 with the following more specific modifiers:
Before coding the encounter, check with the payer to see which modifier it prefers for a distinct procedural service.
Related Articles
Modifier Coding Alert
- Surgery:
Put Postop Surgeries into Focus with 78, 79
Crucial question: Is second surgery related to most recent procedure? When a patient has to [...] - Third-Party Billing:
Use Modifier 32 When Third Party Mandates Service
Third-party payers could include social workers, lawyers. When you are billing for services under the [...] - Specialty Focus:
Anesthesia: Represent Patient's Health with P Modifiers
Here’s why you must use modifiers even when you don’t get paid extra. Whenever a [...] - Reader Question:
I.D. Separate Sites Before Using 59 for Lesion Excision, Repair
Question: We billed CPT® codes 12042 and 11420 with modifier 51. I billed the 12042 as [...] - Reader Question:
Consider F/T, 51 Modifiers When Provider Fixes Cut, Splints Finger
Question: A patient reports to the physician with a laceration to her left index finger, extending [...] - Reader Question:
Include Modifier GC,Avert TP Coding Headaches
Question: What are the rules on teaching physicians (TP) being present during surgical procedures? Should we [...] - Reader Question:
Remember RT, 25 on FBR + E/M Claims
Question: An established patient who was shooting off fireworks the previous day reports to the office [...] - You Be the Expert:
Coding Return E/Ms for Similar Injuries
Question: An established patient with a history of left knee injuries reported to our family physician [...]