Neurology & Pain Management Coding Alert

Modifiers 101:

Proving Separate E/M Services Makes for Modifier 25 Success

Avoid overusing this modifier and soliciting an audit with four tips.If you find yourself especially overwhelmed and confused by modifier 25 (Significant, separately identifiable evaluation and management service by the same physician on the same day of the procedure or other service), you're not alone. Luckily, you can use these four criteria to determine whether modifier 25 is right for your neurology coding assignment.1. Modifier 25 is for E/M OnlyYou can only consider reporting modifier 25 when coding an E/M service. If the procedures you're reporting don't fall under E/M services, it's possible the encounter qualifies for another modifier instead.How it works: You would use modifier 25 to indicate you have documentation that supports an E/M was significant and separately identifiable from the work included in another service or procedure. By contrast, modifier 59 (Distinct procedural service) can be used only to distinguish one procedure from another procedure.2. Extent of [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Neurology & Pain Management Coding Alert

View All