Advanced Search

Neurosurgery Coding Alert

Reader Question:

Modifier -62 Is OK for 22855

Published on Tue Feb 10, 2004

Question: My surgeon worked with an orthopedic surgeon during removal of anterior spinal instrumentation. Our office and the orthopedic surgeon reported this using 22855-62, and the payer denied the claim. What should we have done differently?

Missouri Subscriber Answer: Assuming your documentation was complete, you'll want to appeal the claim. 

In 2003, CPT revised the instructional text accompanying the codes in the "Spine (Vertebral Column)" portion (22100-22855) to reflect new surgery guidelines. Specifically, prior versions of CPT instructed, "Do not append modifier '-62' [Two surgeons] to spinal instrumentation codes 22840-22855." For 2003, these instructions changed to state, "Do not append modifier '-62' to spinal instrumentation codes 22840-22848 and 22850-22852." This means that two surgeons may work (and bill) as co-surgeons during reinsertion of spinal fixation device (22849) or removal of anterior instrumentation (22855) as long as they work together as primary surgeons.

Possibly your payer missed these changes in CPT. If necessary, copy the relevant instructions from CPT and send them along with your appeal.
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Neurosurgery Coding Alert

View All