Neurosurgery Coding Alert

READER QUESTIONS:

Global Periods Can Vary for Unlisted-Procedure Codes

Question: Does Medicare assign a global period for unlisted-procedure codes? For instance, if the surgeon performs kyphoplasty and we report 22899, can we charge for a follow-up office visit 30 days later?


Pennsylvania Subscriber


Answer: National Medicare policy, as reflected in the Physician Fee schedule database, does not establish a formal global period for unlisted-procedure codes such as 22899 (Unlisted procedure, spine). Rather, national Medicare assigns such codes a "YYY" global period, meaning that the individual carrier "is to determine whether the global concept applies and establishes postoperative period, if appropriate, at time of pricing," according to CMS guidelines.

In other words, the payer holds all the cards and can determine whether and what kind of global period to impose when you submit an unlisted-procedure code.

In most cases, the payer will assign a 90-day global period for major procedures, such as kyphoplasty. You can attempt to influence the payer's decision by noting the global period for similar procedures when submitting your claim (for instance, kyphoplasty closely resembles percutaneous vertebroplasty [such as 22520, Percutaneous vertebroplasty, one vertebral body, unilateral or bilateral injection; thoracic] which has a 90-day global period).
 
If the payer does institute a global period, you should not report follow-up visits during that designated period as separate services.
 
Don't make assumptions about your payer's rules, however. For example, NHIC, a Medicare carrier in California, does not impose any global period on kyphoplasty. In such a case, you may legitimately seek reimbursement for follow-up visits using the appropriate E/M service code (for example, 99213, Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of an established patient ...).
 
The lesson here is to get your payer's guidelines in writing and follow them consistently. Like everything else involving unlisted-procedure claims, this will require extra effort, but taking the extra step will also ensure the best reimbursement and ensure that you will not face charges of fraudulent coding.
 
- Clinical and coding expertise for You Be the Coder and Reader Questions provided by Eric Sandhusen, CHC, CPC, director of compliance, Columbia University department of surgery.
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Neurosurgery Coding Alert

View All