Neurosurgery Coding Alert

Reader Questions:

Limit -77 to Same Day

Question: One of our surgeons performed a decompressive laminectomy for a patient in 2001. Another surgeon in our practice performed decompressive laminectomy on the same patient in 2005. I billed the second procedure with modifier -77, and the payer reduced our reimbursement because of the modifier.

My question is: When is it appropriate to report modifier -77?


Pennsylvania Subscriber


Answer: You should report modifier -77 (Repeat procedure by another physician) when another physician repeats a procedure on the same day. The modifier alerts the payer that you have not mistakenly reported the procedure twice.

The decompressive laminectomy (for example, 63001, Laminectomy with exploration and/or decompression of spinal cord and/or cauda equina, without facetectomy, foraminotomy or diskectomy [e.g., spinal stenosis], one or two vertebral segments; cervical) in 2005 isn't really a "repeat" of the same procedure in 2001, as described by modifier -77.

In this case, you should contact the payer and inform it of your error: Your surgeon deserves full reimbursement for the laminectomy.
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Neurosurgery Coding Alert

View All