Advanced Search

Oncology & Hematology Coding Alert

E/M Coding:

Knock Out Questions on New/Established Patient E/M

Published on Sun Aug 22, 2010

Remember, what used to be a consultation is now likely a 99201-99215 service. Suppose the oncologist provides a new patient with a standard office-visit E/M. You mistakenly use an established patient E/M to code the encounter. No big deal, right? Wrong -- Not only is the coding incorrect, but this mistake will cost your practice deserved reimbursement. Further, Medicare's deletion of consultation codes means that coders will have to answer the new vs. established question more often than before. For Medicare payers, and payers that follow their lead, coders now have to "select the correct code, new or established, to bill for what used to be consults and did not have a new versus established component concept," relays Quinten A. Buechner, M.S., M.Div., AAPC:CPC, BMSC:ACS-FP/GI/PEDS, ACMCS:PCS, PHIA:CCP, PAHCS:CMSCS, president of ProActive Consultants in Cumberland, Wis. Nail the patient's status every time by following this expert advice on new and established patients. [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Oncology & Hematology Coding Alert

View All