Oncology & Hematology Coding Alert
Avoid Confusion With This Chemo Infusion Scenario
Question: Do I need a modifier to bill 96413 and +96368 together on the same date of service, and if so, should I use 59 or XU? AAPC Forum Participant Answer: The short answer is no. Billing 96413 (Chemotherapy administration, intravenous infusion technique; up to 1 hour, single or initial substance/drug) along with +96368 (Intravenous infusion, for therapy, prophylaxis, or diagnosis (specify substance or drug); concurrent infusion (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure)) on the same date of service occurs frequently in oncology. But there is no need to append modifier 59 (Distinct procedural service) or XU (Unusual Non-Overlapping Service, the use of a service that is distinct because it does not overlap usual components of the main service) to one of the infusion codes when you do because +96368 is an add on code to the initial infusion code 96413, and this code pair is not subject to a National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) edit. Remember: You would use the 96413/+96368 code combination in a situation where your patient received a therapeutic drug infusion from a separate bag (infusate) than the chemotherapy drug running during the same time interval. If the patient was receiving the two drugs at the same time from the same bag, you’d use +96367 (Intravenous infusion, for therapy, prophylaxis, or diagnosis (specify substance or drug); additional sequential infusion of a new drug/ substance, up to 1 hour (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure)) instead of +96368.
Oncology & Hematology Coding Alert
- Diagnosis Focus:
Up the Ante on Your Anemia Coding
Here’s how to navigate all the associated condition codes. Look up anemia in the ICD-10-CM [...] - Learn the 4 Main Forms of Anemia
According to the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), there are four main types [...] - E/M Coding:
Follow 5 Tips to Solidify Inpatient Care Coding
Stay on top of the hospital E/M revisions. For the last year, you have been [...] - Modifiers:
Remember These Modifier 22 Dos and Don’ts
Beware of falling into the unlisted code trap. Consider this scenario: Your oncologist decides to [...] - You Be the Coder:
Avoid Confusion With This Chemo Infusion Scenario
Question: Do I need a modifier to bill 96413 and +96368 together on the same date [...] - Reader Question:
Don’t Split These Chemo Components
Question: I bill for an outpatient service department at a local hospital, and when patients come [...] - Reader Question:
Be Suspicious of Suspected Diagnoses
Question: Our providers are notorious for using “consistent with” and “likely” when documenting their diagnoses. I [...] - Reader Question:
Look to This LCD for Breast Reconstruction Necessity
Question: I billed 19318-RT for symmetry with 19361-LT for breast cancer and absence of breast. Medicare [...]
