Ophthalmology and Optometry Coding Alert

Reporting Related Codes? Use Modifiers -59, -51 to Keep Claims Clear

Modifier -59 is for procedures you don't normally report together

When a patient requires cataract surgery and a vitrectomy in the same session, do you report only one code? If the ophthalmologist repairs a seriously dislocated lens, do you automatically assume there is only one reportable procedure?

If you answered "yes" to either of these questions, you may not be taking advantage of all situations in which you can use modifiers -59 and -51. Read on for more information on these modifiers, which may be helpful when you report related codes on the same claim.

Modifier -59 Works When Codes Are Close

Ophthalmology coders use modifier -59 (Distinct procedural service) to identify procedures that are distinctly separate from any other procedure or service the physician provides on the same date. In general, coders append modifier -59 to procedure codes when the physician:

  • sees a patient during a different session
  • treats a different site or organ system
  • sees a patient during a different encounter
  • treats a different organ system
  • treats a separate injury.

    Modifier -59 is "used when multiple procedures in the same (code areas) are performed at the same time," says Linda Parks, MA, CPC, CMC, CCP, coding specialist in Marietta, Ga.

    Example: Apatient with a previously diagnosed vitreous prolapse reports to the ophthalmologist for cataract surgery. During the session, the physician performs cataract surgery and a vitrectomy.

    You should:

  • report 66984 (Extracapsular cataract removal with insertion of intraocular lens prosthesis [one-stage procedure], manual or mechanical technique [e.g., irrigation and aspiration or phacoemulsification]) for the cataract removal.
  • attach modifier -59 to 67010 (Removal of vitreous, anterior approach [open sky technique or limbal incision]; subtotal removal with mechanical vitrectomy) to represent the vitrectomy.

    Why? The modifier shows the carrier that the vitrectomy was a separate problem from the cataract removal, and not incidental to the cataract procedure.

    Remember: The higher the relative value units (RVUs) for a given code, the more you'll be paid for the procedure. Always attach modifier -59 to the code with the lower RVUs.

    Not Sure? Check NCCI

    If you're stuck on whether you should bill codes with modifier -59, check the National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) edits, Parks says. If the codes you are reporting have indicators of "1" next to them, this means you can append the modifier to bypass the edit. If the code has an indicator of "0," you cannot bypass the edit. The NCCI edits change quarterly, so be sure to keep abreast of all updates.

    Time-saver: Increase your modifier -59 reimbursement rate by using -59 only when absolutely necessary, experts say. Many private payers do not require a modifier for multiple-procedure scenarios or don't recognize -59 as a legitimate modifier. Check with your
    individual payer to see if modifier -59 is necessary when reporting multiple-procedure claims.

    Tip: Each time you are unsure whether a carrier accepts modifier -59 or prefers some other modifier or reporting method, call the carrier immediately and ask for clarification, Parks says. Then, chart each carrier's policies on -59 so you know whether to use it the next time you file a claim.

    Making these phone calls may take a little time initially, but once you get a chart with each insurance company's policy on modifier -59, your claims department will be streamlined dramatically.

    However, don't be afraid to use modifier -59 if you have to -- just make sure you've exhausted all other options and you are using it as it was intended, as the "modifier of last resort."

    Use Modifier -51 for Multiple Procedures

    When your physician treats a patient who requires multiple procedures, you would include modifier -51 (Multiple procedures) on your claim.

    Modifier -51 is "an informational-type modifier ... for use on the second, third, etc., surgical procedure performed on the same day," says Barbara J. Girvin Riesser, RN, CCS, CCS-P, CPC, of Medical Management Resources in Kansas City, Mo.

    Example: A patient reports with a seriously dislocated lens that requires a significant posterior vitrectomy. You should first select the cataract extraction procedure based on whether it was an intracapsular or extracapsular procedure.

    If it was an intracapsular extraction, you should:

  • report 67036 (Vitrectomy, mechanical, pars plana approach) to represent the vitrectomy.
  • attach modifier -51 to 66983 (Intracapsular cataract extraction with insertion of intraocular lens prosthesis [one-stage procedure]) for the extraction.

    If it was an extracapsular extraction, you should:

  • report 67036 to represent the vitrectomy.
  • attach modifier -51 to 66984 (Extracapsular cataract removal with insertion of intraocular lens prosthesis [one-stage procedure], manual or mechanical technique [e.g., irrigation and aspiration or phacoemulsi-fication]) for the extraction.

    Why? In both of the above coding scenarios, modifier -51 is appropriate because it shows that the two procedures are actually separate and that you're not "double-dipping" with your claim, Riesser says. Modifier -51 indicates to the insurance company that the procedures were unrelated to each other.

    Check RVUs Before Ordering Codes

    On modifier -51 claims, the code that stands alone is the code that will be fully paid, so make sure you attach modifier -51 to the code with the lower RVU.

    "Modifier -51 prevents the insurance company from changing the order of your codes, because the most expensive procedure should be listed first," Riesser says.

    Remember: While reimbursement rates for codes with modifier -59 attached vary by payer, expect half the normal reimbursement for codes with modifier -51 attached. (Most insurance companies have adopted Medicare's policy of paying 50 percent for codes with modifier -51 attached.)

  • Other Articles in this issue of

    Ophthalmology and Optometry Coding Alert

    View All