Ophthalmology and Optometry Coding Alert

You Be the Coder:

Report Postoperative Care Accurately and Ethically

Question: Our practice has one doctor (Dr. A) who comes to our office from another state once a month. He performs surgery - a glaucoma repair, for example - and another doctor here (Dr. B) sees the patient one week afterward for a follow-up exam and to remove the stitches. This is usually the only post-op care Dr. B provides, and he thinks he should be able to bill for his time. He doesn't want to split the global payment with Dr. A; he thinks Dr. A should get the full reimbursement. Dr. B just wants to be paid for the time in which he saw the patient once and removed the stitches. What can I do?

Mississippi Subscriber

Answer: The only way that Dr. B will see reimbursement for his time with the patient is if you report the main surgery code and append modifier -55 (Postoperative management only).

In your example of glaucoma repair, 66150 (Fistulization of sclera for glaucoma; trephination with iridectomy), Dr. B's postoperative care would earn him 20 percent of the total global reimbursement. (See columns P, Q and R of the Physician Fee Schedule Database for percentages allowed for pre-, intra- and postoperative care.)
Insurers would likely view any work he did for the patient within the 90-day postsurgical period - such as E/M services or suture removal - as bundled into 66150 and deny any separate claim.

Beware: For a claim with modifier -55 to be successful, Dr. A must have reported 66150 with modifiers -54 (Surgical care only) and -56 (Preoperative management only) appended. This would entitle him to 80 percent of the global amount (adding the pre- and intraoperative care amounts).

In this case, it would be incorrect for Dr. A to report the global code with no modifiers and receive reimbursement for work he did not perform. Because Dr. A does not see the patients for any postoperative visits, he should only be reporting the pre- and intraoperative portions of the procedure.

Giving Dr. A the full global amount may appear to insurers as if you're paying him extra for work he did not perform, which might provoke an audit. Using modifiers -54, -55 and -56 to split the global amount between the two doctors is both the most accurate and the most ethical way to report their work.

Other Articles in this issue of

Ophthalmology and Optometry Coding Alert

View All