Orthopedic Coding Alert

Reader Questions:

Negative History May Mean No History

Question: When the orthopedist writes, "Past history is negative," would this satisfy the "past history" element when we decide the extent of the history portion of the E/M code? The guidelines state that "at least one specific item from any of the three history areas must be documented for a pertinent PFSH."

Colorado Subscriber Answer: You are correct that the physician should document at least one item from one of the three areas: past medical, family, or social history. Expanding the phrase in question to "past history negative for arthritis" - or whatever the presenting problem - is appropriate.
 
Auditors may interpret "Past history negative" as meaning that the physician didn't take a history, so make sure the physician knows to document each E/M element.
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Orthopedic Coding Alert

View All