Otolaryngology Coding Alert

2-Physician Surgery Doesn't Make Modifier -62 a Shoe-In

Reserve co-surgery appendage for when ENT shares procedure You should limit modifier -62 use to operations in which the otolaryngologist performs part of the same procedure with the other surgeon.

Modifier -62's descriptor - "two surgeons" - can be deceptively simple. Just because an operation involves two surgeons doesn't mean modifier -62 is appropriate. Let these expert-provided tips guide you in coding the following case study:

Modifier -62 or Not? You Decide Procedure: One otolaryngologist performs a total pharyngolaryngectomy with modified radical neck dissection. Another otolaryngologist (same practice) performs a complex wound reconstruction that involves a tubed, radial forearm flap with microvascular anastomosis as well as a skin graft to the arm where the surgeon took the flap from.

Possible codes: "I believe this is probably a co-surgery with code 31395-62," says Robin Trahon, CPC, coding specialist at Otolaryngology Group in Dedham, Mass.

Problem: The reconstruction that the otolaryngologist performed is much more radical and difficult than 31395 (Pharyngolaryngectomy, with radical neck dissection; with reconstruction) describes. "Would the reconstruction be so complex as to warrant not billing this as co-surgery, but billing separately for 15758 (Free fascial flap with microvascular anastomosis) and 15100 (Split graft, trunk, arms, legs; first 100 sq cm or less, or 1 percent of body area of infants and children [except 15050])?" Trahon asks. Co-Surgery Applies to Single Code First, you should remember that modifier -62 refers to a single procedure (same CPT codes and add-on codes). Just because two physicians perform surgery on the same patient during the same operative session doesn't mean they were co-surgeons.

Better way: "The general rule is if two surgeons are required to perform a specific procedure, each surgeon bills for the procedure with modifier -62 plus any associated add-on codes performed during a procedure in which the two surgeons continue to work together as primary surgeons," says Jean Ryan, LPN, CPC, consultant and application specialist at QuadraMed in Fargo, N.D.

For instance, you would use modifier -62 when a neurosurgeon and an otolaryngologist perform neuroendoscopy with excision of a pituitary tumor, says Danielle Demaio-Deangelis, CPC, director of practice operations at Thomas Jefferson University Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery in Philadelphia. The otolaryngologist could perform the approach while the neurosurgeon excises the tumor. Because both surgeons perform portions of the same procedure (62165, Neuroendoscopy, intracranial; with excision of pituitary tumor, transcranial or trans-sphenoidal approach), modifier -62 appropriately describes the otolaryngologist and neurosurgeon's roles as co-surgeons.

To avoid denials, the otolaryngologist and neurosurgeon must report the same CPT (62165-62) and ICD-9 codes (such as 194.3, Malignant neoplasm of pituitary gland and craniopharyngeal duct). Each co-surgeon charges 125 percent of the global surgery fee schedule amount and is paid half or 62.5 percent of the global surgery [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Otolaryngology Coding Alert

View All