Advanced Search

Otolaryngology Coding Alert

Reader Question:

69610 Covers Tube Removal Plus Ear Drum Patch

Published on Tue Jun 17, 2014

You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.

Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:

Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Related Articles

Modifier 25: Avoid These Traps When Reporting Modifier 25 and Know That 'Separate' Is Justified

Allergy Testing: Breeze Through Spring With Denial-Proof Allergy Coding

Procedure Focus: Let 3 Scenarios Guide Your Coding for Separate Ear Tube Removal

Other Articles in this issue of

Otolaryngology Coding Alert

Condition Focus:
Get the Lowdown on Sleep Apnea and Hearing Loss
Hint: Knowing the type points you to the diagnosis. A study presented at the 2014 [...]

Research Rundown:
Study Shows That Certain Ethnicities Could Be More Prone to Hearing Loss With Apnea
High frequency hearing impairment outweighed low. The research study found that about 10 percent of [...]

Payer Update:
Watch When You Can Submit E/M With Modifier 25
Another payer says it’s rarely allowable. With insurers seeming to constantly change their stances on [...]

Coding Update:
Here's Your Good News for Filing 69210 With E/M Codes
Get ready for reprocessed claims to earn extra dollars from Cigna. With one of the [...]

ICD-10:
Prepare to Track Number of Visits for Treatment of FBR in Nose or Ear
ICD-10 will help you report the service more accurately. When your otolaryngologist removes a [...]

Reader Question:
69610 Covers Tube Removal Plus Ear Drum Patch
Question: The following report was submitted by one of our physicians: “The inferior myringotomy tube was [...]

Reader Question:
Watch Your Modifiers When Reporting Part of VNG Service
Question: A local neurology group’s VNG machine is broken and they want to refer the patients [...]

Reader Question:
Remember That 31541 Includes Biopsy
Question: A surgeon performed two procedures during the operative session: Direct laryngoscopy with microsuspension laryngoscopy and [...]

Reader Question:
Follow Payer Preference for Reporting Consults
Question: Our payers always deny our claims with 99283 or 99284, even though we’re reporting a [...]

Reader Question:
Higher E/M Comes From More Than Extended HPI
Question: Does an extended HPI guarantee a higher-level E/M code? Washington Subscriber Answer: No, an extended history [...]

Reader Question:
Know When to Turn to 99499
Question: Can I use modifier 52 on 99201 if my provider only captures history and MDM [...]

Reader Question:
Learn the Difference Between NEC and NOS Designations
Question: One thing I’ve seen when looking at the ICD-10-CM manual is the note of “NEC” [...]

You Be the Coder:
Determine if You Need More Than 69641
Question: I have a question regarding harvesting of graft(s) during tympanomastoidectomy. The otolaryngologist states he harvested [...]

View All