Advanced Search

Otolaryngology Coding Alert

Reader Questions:

Replace 92589 With Time-Specific Code(s)

Published on Sat Jan 01, 2005

Question: I received a denial for 92589 with service date of Jan. 5. Should I appeal the decision?

California Subscriber
 
Answer: The payer probably denied your claim because 92589 (Central auditory function test[s] [specify]) is not a valid code on that service date. CPT 2005 deleted the code. You should now use two time-specific codes that replace 92589. Choose the appropriate code(s) based on the session's length.
    
When an otolaryngologist or audiologist spends 60 (30-67) minutes evaluating a patient's central auditory function, you should assign 92620 (Evaluation of central auditory function, with report; initial 60 minutes). For each additional 15 minutes (starting with minute 67 1/2) he spends on the evaluation, you should report 92621     (... each additional 15 minutes).
 
Warning: You should never file 92621 alone. Always report 92620 as the base code. Then, when appropriate, use 92621 as an add-on code.




You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Otolaryngology Coding Alert

View All