Otolaryngology Coding Alert

You Be the Coder:

'Plasty,' Not Condition, Determines 69140 Versus 69310

Question: An otolaryngologist performs a canalplasty with osteoma excision. Should I report 69310 because the patient has stenosis due to the osteoma, or would 69140 be more appropriate? Illinois Subscriber Answer: You should select the code based on whether the otolaryngologist reconstructed the external auditory canal, not the patient's condition (which, in this case, is stenosis). If the otolaryngologist made the incision, removed the osteoma, and replaced the skin, you should report 69140 (Excision exostosis[es], external auditory canal). But if he performed a "plasty," such as drilling the bony canal or attaching skin grafts, you should assign 69310 (Reconstruction of external auditory canal [meatoplasty] [e.g., for stenosis due to injury, infection] [separate procedure]).
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.