Part B Insider (Multispecialty) Coding Alert
When 2 Surgeons Collaborate, Make Sure To Communicate
PDF
How to handle fear of the -62 modifier
It strikes terror into physicians' hearts and slashes at their bottom lines. Surgeons will go to great lengths to avoid the dreaded -62 modifier. But there are ways to minimize the pain, say experts.
Communication is the key to avoiding mistakes, says Marcella Bucknam, HIM coordinator with Clarkson College in Omaha, NE. "When there's a plan to do a procedure that's going to involve two surgeons, [it's] really valuable if the offices talk to each other before the procedure takes place." These procedures can include craniectomy, craniotomy, or spine surgeries.
"This is so critical and is a place we really fall down," Bucknam adds. "After the procedure there are so many problems that can happen."
"On our spine surgeries we have a lot of problem with who's supposed to be billing what," reports Pat Boudreaux, data specialist with Tyler Neurosurgical Associates in Tyler, TX. "There's a lot of gray area in billing spine co-surgeries."
Often, the coders working for the surgeon who performed the base procedure won't know until weeks afterwards that another surgeon, such as an ENT, collaborated on the procedure by performing the approach. By then, "we would have already filed our claim," says Bucknam.
It's best that all parties concerned understand that nobody should submit their codes before anyone else, says Bucknam. "If one surgeon submits the codes without the modifier -62, the other surgeon won't get paid at all." So even if the surgeons talk beforehand about the procedure and how they'll handle it, there should be a conversation among the coders as well.
If one surgeon gets a claim in early without the -62 modifier, the second surgeon may be stuck billing as an assistant, using the -80 or -82 modifiers. But the reimbursement is greatly reduced for assistants, who usually only receive 20 to 22 percent of what the primary surgeon receives. By contrast, when two surgeons report as co-surgeons, Medicare pays 125 percent of the usual reimbursement and each surgeon receives half of that amount, or 62.5 percent.
These co-surgeries are often "not that hard to bill, if you don't get your Ps and Qs together it can become quite impossible to bill," says Bucknam.
Part B Insider (Multispecialty) Coding Alert
- Appeals:
They Can't Collect Until They Make Their Case
But will carriers let your appeals keep running up the flagpole?
In the past, the carriers [...] - Modifiers:
When 2 Surgeons Collaborate, Make Sure To Communicate
How to handle fear of the -62 modifier
It strikes terror into physicians' hearts and slashes [...] - Statistical Sampling:
Carriers Have More Leeway To Use Smaller Sample Sizes
One reason why carriers don't always play it safe with overpayments: the standards are lax [...] - Transmittals:
Prepare To Lose RVUs When You Perform
Multiple cystourethroscopy procedures receive massive pay cut
Once again, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services [...] - Eye Exam Codes Raised
Transmittal 45 from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services includes pay boosts for six [...] - Unlisted Codes:
Use 22899 For Kyphoplasty, But Make Your Case For Extra Pay
Boost your reimbursement by scanning carrier policies
Often, many of the fastest-growing procedures are the ones [...] - LEGISLATION:
Chances of Medicare Reform Bill Limited
Some are predicting that 2004 will see yet another giant Medicare bill, partly aimed at [...] - Coding & Reimbursement:
Reassignment Of Benefits Will Become Possible Soon
Use per-diem codes for ESRD services if patient is hospitalized during month
[...] - PART B CODING COACH:
2004 ICD-9 Update: Use New V Codes For All Your Insulin Pump Visits
If your physician is using insulin pumps for Type I diabetics, you should know how [...] - Physician Notes:
Non-Compete Keeps Physician From Setting Up Office Across The Street
Court rules that doctor can't work within 25 miles of old stomping ground
If you're hiring [...]