Part B Insider (Multispecialty) Coding Alert

Part B Coding Coach:

Deploy NCCI Know-How for Surgical Coding Conundrums

Published on Thu Oct 18, 2018

PDF

Tip: Review modifier 59 rules, too.

If surgical coding is not something you do every day, it’s in your best interest to review your respective surgical codes aren’t included in the National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) Policy Manual. Oftentimes, the NCCI Policy Manual might offer coding guidelines that contrast with what your gut — and the code’s NCCI edit — tell you.

Sometimes, however, the NCCI Policy Manual guidelines can be notoriously difficult to decipher. As you will see, that’s certainly the case when it comes to coding a thyroidectomy and a parathyroidectomy in the same surgical encounter.

Sift through the guidelines and follow these nuanced rules to make sure that when the moment comes, you’re fully capable of coding this intricate case study.

Compare, Contrast NCCI Policy Manual with NCCI Edit

Scenario: The surgeon performs a complete parathyroidectomy for a benign parathyroid adenoma in addition to a complete thyroidectomy for a multinodular goiter.

The two codes you are looking to consider here are 60500 (Parathyroidectomy or exploration of parathyroid(s)) and 60240 (Thyroidectomy, total or complete). When performing an NCCI check between 60500 and 60240, you see that a modifier “1” status exists between the two codes. Since 60500 is the column 2 code and the provider clearly performs both operations for separate diagnostic reasons, you might think it’s appropriate to append modifier 59 (Distinct Procedural Service) to 60500 and move on.

However, this situation highlights why it’s important to have an extensive knowledge of the broad range of NCCI coding policies. What makes this example even more difficult is the fact that the rules don’t exist where you’d typically expect them to be. Instead of referring to Chapter VIII of the NCCI Policy Manual, you can find this particular NCCI policy in the NCCI General Correspondence Language and Section Specific Examples manual. In this manual, NCCI refers to a scenario in which the surgeon performs a total parathyroidectomy and total thyroidectomy at the same encounter:

“For example, CPT^® code 60240 describes a total or complete thyroidectomy. CPT^® code 60500 describes a parathyroidectomy or exploration of parathyroid(s). The exploration of parathyroid glands with or without parathyroidectomy (CPT^® code 60500) is standard surgical practice when performing a complete thyroidectomy (CPT^® code 60240). Therefore, CPT^® code 60500 is bundled into CPT^® code 60240.”

Dissect the Guidelines with Expert Advice

The answer to this riddle all depends on how you interpret the guidelines.

From a simply practical perspective, this looks to be an open and shut case: 60500 bundles into 60240. However, upon further examination, the answer seems less clear. The point of confusion relates back to the NCCI edit between these codes. If 60500 should exclusively bundle into 60240, why would NCCI place a modifier “1” edit between the two codes? Since this edit openly allows for an overriding modifier, when applicable, it seems that the NCCI guidelines are merely explaining that these two codes should bundle when the exploration of the parathyroid glands is incidental to the underlying thyroidectomy.

The answer might come down to the specifics behind the surgical encounter. Based on the guidelines, if the parathyroid exploration results in the discovery, and subsequent removal, of a parathyroid tumor, then you should bundle the service into 60240.

“The key here — and it should be documented clearly enough — is the intent of the procedure,” says Leslie Johnson, CPC, coding and auditing consultant at Oasis Medical and Surgical Wellness Group, LLC, in Glen Rock, New Jersey. “If the intent is to simply remove the thyroid gland and examine the parathyroid glands during the thyroidectomy process, then you shouldn’t code both procedures,” Johnson explains.

Review This Alternative Clinical Scenario

Say, for instance, that during the parathyroidectomy exploration, a specimen was sent to the lab to determine the behavior of the neoplasm. If, following the results, the parathyroid tumor is removed, then you may code 60500 with modifier 58 (Staged or Related Procedure or Service by the Same Physician or Other Qualified Health care Professional During the Postoperative Period). This remains true whether or not pathology determines the neoplasm is benign or malignant.

Consider another example where the physician diagnoses the parathyroid adenoma beforehand and opts to perform both surgical services in the same operative setting. In this case, you might consider the use of modifier 59. But, before doing so, you need to make sure you understand in which situations the use of modifier 59 is and is not applicable. CMS first advises that, in order to report modifier 59:

“Documentation must support a different session, different procedure or surgery, different site or organ system, separate incision/excision, separate lesion, or separate injury (or area of injury in extensive injuries) not ordinarily encountered or performed on the same day by the same individual.”

Based on these guidelines alone, it sounds as if a scenario in which the surgeon removes the parathyroid adenoma during the thyroidectomy surgery allows for separate billing of both services. One could certainly argue that a “different site or organ system” would qualify 60500 as a separate service. However, the modifier 59 guidelines elaborate further on what constitutes a separate organ or anatomic site:

“From an NCCI perspective, the definition of different anatomic sites includes different organs or, in certain instances, different lesions in the same organ.
“The treatment of contiguous structures in the same organ or anatomic region does not constitute treatment of different anatomic sites.”

Following by the full scope of modifier 59 guidelines, it’s clear that 60500 should not be billed separately when the surgeon removes the thyroid adenoma during the thyroidectomy. “Another way to evaluate this scenario is simply by examining the number of operative sessions,” says Julie Leonard, CPC, CCS, CPCO, ACS-AN, RCC, CRCR, associate director at Kohler HealthCare Consulting in Woodstock, Maryland. “If the provider performs both services in the same operative setting, then you should follow the original NCCI guidelines and bundle 60500 into 60240,” Leonard relays.