Part B Insider (Multispecialty) Coding Alert
Kiss Grace Period for New Codes Goodbye
PDF
HIPAA kills 90-day safety zone
Feeling tied up in knots by new coding requirements? Now you can blame the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act for another layer of inflexibility.
HIPAA requires the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to scrap the 90-day grace period that used to be in place for changes to HCPCS, CPT and ICD-9 codes, according to two new transmittals (Nos. 89 and 95).
The grace period aimed to allow providers "to ascertain the new codes and learn about the discontinued codes," CMS says.
HIPAA's "transaction and code set rule requires usage of the medical code set that is valid at the time that the service is provided," the agency says. "Therefore, CMS is eliminating the 90-day grace period for billing discontinued ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes" effective Oct. 1, 2004, and HCPCS and CPT codes effective Jan. 1, 2005, CMS tells providers in the Feb. 6 transmittals.
So when the new ICD-9 codes take effect Oct. 1, the old codes will phase out immediately, and the same thing will happen when new CPT codes take effect next Jan.
1. Also in new transmittals:
And that's not the only change. Contractors must complete all redeterminations within 60 days and use a new letter to inform providers of their decisions. More appeals-system changes required in recent years' Medicare laws will be forthcoming, CMS promises.
Instead of relying on various contractors to write up provider education articles on new CMS instructions in the very short window of time after their issuances, CMS will now provide both the instruction and the education article at the same time, the agency says in Transmittal 54, issued Feb. 5. "CMS has decided to prepare consistent materials for contractor outreach for Medicare providers in a centralized fashion," available on CMS' Medlearn Web site (www.cms.hhs.gov/medlearn/matters).
CMS aims to eliminate disparities due to differing interpretations or just confusing or inadequate educational language, it says.
Part B Insider (Multispecialty) Coding Alert
- Pulmonary Function Tests:
Unbundling Is a Constant Danger With Spirometry Claims
Pay attention to NCCI edits, common sense
Billing for pulmonary function tests, also known as spirometry, [...] - Documentaton:
The Denial Is in the Details for Routine EKGs
Documentation doesn't have to be separate, but it must be identifiable
When an emergency physician interprets [...] - No Time Limit to Change Charts
Some providers believe that they have a limited time, such as 30 days after discharge, [...] - Routine EKGs:
Two Readings, One EKG - Who Bills?
Cardiologists and emergency physicians tussle over payments
A patient comes into the emergency room, and the [...] - Separate but Not Looseleaf
Don't send documentation back just because you're not on the same page
The biggest misunderstanding many [...] - Invasive Line Placement:
Separate Billing for Invasive Line Placement Requires Documentation
Check state laws, carrier policies for 36555, 36620, and 93503
If your anesthesiologist places an invasive [...] - Physician Services Not Bundled in SNFs
Billing for separate services in a skilled nursing facility can be tricky - especially when Medicare [...] - Transmittals:
Kiss Grace Period for New Codes Goodbye
HIPAA kills 90-day safety zone
Feeling tied up in knots by new coding requirements? Now you [...] - Part B Coding Coach - 3 Strategies Guide Your 'Late Effects' Coding
If you're overlooking late effects when assigning ICD-9 codes, you're providing incomplete information and possibly [...] - Physician Notes:
Clinical Studies May Be at Risk for Kickback Attacks
Watch your copayment collection to avoid getting whacked
The intersection of clinical [...]