Pathology/Lab Coding Alert

88120, 88121 Won't Solve PhD Problem

You'll still need physician for professional component. You can't report 88367-88368 (Morphometric analysis, in situ hybridization (quantitative or semiquantitative), each probe) if a PhD results the test instead of a physician interpretation. Should you expect the same restriction if you're using the new codes for urinary tract specimens (88120-88121, Cytopathology, in situ hybridization (e.g., FISH), urinary tract specimen with morphometric analysis, 3-5 molecular probes, each specimen)? "Medicare law doesn't recognize doctorate level professionals (PhD) for professional component payment," says Dennis Padget, MBA, CPA, FHFMA, president of DLPadget Enterprises Inc. and publisher of the Pathology Service Coding Handbook, in The Villages, Fla. "Medicare law isn't affected by state certification standards for PhDs -- test results by a laboratory PhD alone aren't payable under Medicare Part B...period." Review CMS 88367-88368 Restriction Don't expect to report 88367 or 88368 to Medicare if a PhD alone performs the professional component. CMS states the following in [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Pathology/Lab Coding Alert

View All