Pathology/Lab Coding Alert

Did You Lose $125? Check Your Quiz Answers Here to Find Out

Make sure you captured every specimen and ancillary service. Check your answers to the nasal specimen quick quiz found opposite. Plus, discover roughly how much you'll earn by avoiding common nasal-specimen coding errors. Answer 1: Because the surgeon separately identified, and the pathologist separately diagnosed, three distinct nasal polyp specimens, you should code this case as three units of 88304 (Level III -- Surgical pathology, gross and microscopic examination, polyps, inflammatory -- nasal/sinusoidal). By avoiding the "plural" pitfall -- erroneously assuming that "polyps" in the CPT code descriptor means you must bundle all polyps as one specimen -- you avoid losing almost $125 for your practice (based on 2009 physician fee schedule national non-facility total global relative value units). Answer 2: You should charge this case using a single CPT code for the gross and microscopic pathology exam. Because "sinus contents" is an unlisted specimen, you'll bill this service based on the physician work [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Pathology/Lab Coding Alert

View All