Pathology/Lab Coding Alert

Reader Questions:

Make Sure Stain is 'Special'

Question: We use a May-Grunwald-Giemsa stain on bone marrow specimens. Since the stain is not for microorganisms, should we use 88313 to report the work? Colorado Subscriber Answer: No, you should not report +88313 (Special stains [list separately in addition to code for primary service]; Group II, all other [e.g., iron, trichrome], except immunocytochemistry and immunoperoxidase stains, each) for the May-Grunwald-Giemsa stain for bone marrow. You are correct that you should use +88313 for special stains for "other" than microorganisms. CPT reserves +88312 (- Group I for microorganisms [e.g., Gridley, acid fast, methenamine silver], each) to describe special stains performed to help detect microorganisms. Here's the caveat: May-Grunwald-Giemsa is not a "special stain" for bone marrow specimens. For bone marrow smears, the Wright stain or the May-Grunwald-Giemsa stain is the default stain to enhance cytologic detail for routine morphologic specimen evaluation. Just as you should not report a special stain [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more