Pathology/Lab Coding Alert

You Be the Coder:

Pap Smear

Question: The initial screening for a Pap smear was within normal limits. But during quality assurance (QA) review, atypical cells are identified and an addendum report stating this is issued. Can the pathologist bill CPT 88141 for the addendum report?

Maine Subscriber

Test your coding knowledge. Determine how you would code this situation before looking at the box below for the answer.


  Answer: This question falls into an ethical dilemma and no hard and fast answer is available. Code 88141 (cytopathology, cervical or vaginal [any reporting system]; requiring interpretation by physician [list separately in addition to code for technical service]) should only be ordered when requiring interpretation by physician. The key word in this code is requiring. In this case, the cytotechnologists initial screening did not require physician interpretation. Rather, the review of the slide was part of the labs QA, not at the cytologists request based on an abnormal screening. That would make it a non-billable test. These nonbillable tests are rare. It is quite well documented that any billing associated with QA is not acceptable, as QA is considered part of the service provided with the procedure.
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.