Compliance Corner:
Avoid Fraud Allegations With the Latest Stark Info
Published on Fri Aug 01, 2008
Navigate the 2008 twists and turns with this list As a biller, your practice's compliance often falls upon your shoulders along with billing and collections duties. Keeping up on all the changes isn't easy. If you-re still not up on the Stark III changes that came out in September 2007, you need to get up to speed fast to determine that your practice is compliant with the new laws. Take a look at this expert breakdown of the latest changes, and tackle any problems in your office before you and your physician fall victim to fraud charges. Background: This group of strict regulations that prohibit physician self-referrals saw its third major set of revisions and interpretations go into effect Dec. 4, 2007, and even then, not all the loose ends were tied up. Remember: For Medicare and Medicaid cases (and potentially other payers on the state level), Stark prohibits physicians from making a referral to a "designated health service" (DHS) with which the physician or an immediate family member of the physician has any type of financial relationship -- unless the DHS fully complies with one of Stark's many exceptions. A DHS can be anything from rehabilitation therapy services to imaging services or DME. -Stand in the Shoes- Will Keep You on Your Toes If you thought you were safe being one step away from a Stark-sticky situation, think again. Stark III declared a new "stand in the shoes" concept, which forces physicians in groups to be directly accountable for their group's financial arrangements. How it works: "CMS has now collapsed the doctor and his group into one layer" as far as business arrangements go, says Linda Baumann, Esq, JD, with Arent Fox LLP in Washington, D.C. "So, for example, if a physician member of a group practice refers patients to a hospital, and the group contracts with the hospital, the physician now has to meet a direct compensation arrangement exception." Before, the physician would likely have been safe under the indirect compensation arrangement analysis; in other words, she was safe as long as the group wasn't paying her based on the volume or value of her referrals to the hospital. DME Services Still a Tricky Route The "in-office ancillary exception" allows providers to perform certain ancillary services in-house for a physician. For example, rehab services can be provided in a physician's office under certain circumstances. That exception, however, did not protect most durable medical equipment (DME). Nevertheless, some physicians provided DME in their offices thinking that the Stark Law was not implicated because the physician was "personally providing" the DME to the patient. And under the Stark Law, a personally performed service does not constitute a referral that triggers [...]