Primary Care Coding Alert

1 Tool You Need Before Coding a Skin Lesion Excision

" CPT, ICD-9 force you to withhold suspicious-lesion claims Don't be tempted to bill claims for patients' suspicious skin lesions up front. You should instead defer coding until you receive the pathology report.

We wait for the pathology report to code any lesions that the family physician (FP) has suspicions about" " says Shari Aloway CPC coding specialist at Flowertown Family Physicians in Summerville S.C.

Why: Waiting for the pathology report allows you to select appropriate CPT and ICD-9 codes says Mary I. Falbo MBA CPC president of Millennium Healthcare Consulting in Landsdale Pa. Until the pathologist determines the skin lesion's nature you don't have enough information to choose either code. However you may think making the patient wait for a bill or pay more if the skin lesion is malignant is inappropriate. But coding without a pathology report can prove an insurmountable feat. If you still think you can code skin lesion excisions without a pathology report take this challenge: Find a CPT and ICD-9 combination that describes a "suspicious" skin lesion. CPT Offers Benign or Malignant Categories No suspicious or uncertain skin lesion excision code exists. CPT contains only benign and malignant lesion removal codes says Susan LeFevre CPC coder at the 10-FP Reedsburg Area Medical Center in Reedsburg Wis. Suppose your FP removes a 2-mm suspicious skin lesion from a patient's back using a 1-mm margin. You have to choose between two procedural codes:
  11400 - Excision benign lesion including margins except skin tag (unless listed elsewhere) trunk arms or legs; excised diameter 0.5 cm or less
11600 - Excision malignant lesion including margins trunk arms or legs; excised diameter 0.5 cm or less.   You could lose about $43 ($151.97 rather than $109.03 based on Medicare's geographically unadjusted rate) if you pre-emptively report a benign skin lesion code. "Reimbursement is higher for malignant lesions " Aloway says. Problem: Your patients may question charging based on malignancy. "How can you justify billing a higher price for a cancerous lesion?" LeFevre asks. The FP performs the same procedure regardless of the pathologist's findings. A malignancy may contribute more to your bottom line but you shouldn't code according to price. Reporting a malignancy justifies future services Falbo explains. And payers typically won't cover benign skin lesion removal. You won't know if you should charge the patient for the noncovered service until you know the lesion's type. Solution: Hold the claim until a pathology report leads you to or confirms your CPT code selection. 'Suspicious'Doesn't Mean 'Uncertain ''Unspecified' In the above suspicious-back-lesion example your diagnostic options include:
  malignant such as 173.5 -- Other malignant [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Primary Care Coding Alert

View All