Primary Care Coding Alert

Use Inside Info to Prevent HPI Rule Hunt

In CMS's eyes, this element is your FP's duty Although support staff might want to lighten the FP's preservice load, one history element must remain the physician's domain for clinical and compliance reasons. You-re not alone if you-ve read and reread the E/M documentation guidelines looking for the definitive answer to who can perform the history of present illness (HPI). In many family medicine practices, a nurse takes a patient's past, family and social history (PFSH) and review of systems (ROS). The FP then obtains the HPI. If your practice wants to verify whether this is a proper use of everyone's time, you might be hard-pressed to find the guideline in writing. Here's where to turn for guidance, and the requirements staff need to stick to. Sort Out History Territory You may permit a staff member, or even allow the patient or patient's guardian, to record the PFSH and ROS elements. This guidance stems from the CMS-approved E/M documentation guidelines. "The ROS and/or PFSH may be recorded by ancillary staff or on a form completed by the patient," according to the 1995 and 1997 documentation guidelines for E/M services. Don't miss: The physician must document that he reviewed the PFSH and ROS history elements. The notation must supplement or confirm the information that others recorded, the guidelines state. For instance, if an FP reviews a patient-completed PFSH and ROS form, he could indicate his review "with a brief line, such as -I reviewed the history form filled out by the patient on Sept. 4, 2007,-" says Margaret M. Maley, BSN, MS. He should also sign and date the form and retain it in the patient's medical record. Consider Lack of Guidance as Guidance Because the E/M guidelines create concrete PFSH and ROS recording criteria, many people look to the same place for HPI reporting information. "The guidelines have never defined if the staff was allowed to document the history of present illness," says Teresa Thompson, CPC, CMSCS, CCC, a consultant in Carlsborg, Wash. Catch this: The absence of any HPI performer statement indicates ancillary staff does not have permission to collect the HPI, says Barbara J. Cobuzzi, MBA, CPC-OTO, CPC-H, CPC-P, CPC-I, CHCC, president of CRN Healthcare Solutions, a coding and reimbursement consulting firm in Tinton Falls, N.J. The E/M guidelines specifically state that ancillary staff can collect ROS and PFSH. If CMS had extended HPI permission to staff, the guidelines would have included this allowance. Count HPI Work as Part of E/M In fact, physicians actually get paid for this work if the payer uses the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. CMS explained that the E/M service code values include physician work for performing the HPI, says Mary Pat Johnson, [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Primary Care Coding Alert

View All