Advanced Search

Pulmonology Coding Alert

Evaluation and Management:

Complete A Comprehensive Consultation To Optimize Reimbursement

Published on Mon Feb 28, 2011

Find out the importance of documenting pertinent positive/negative responses.Level-four and level-five office visits are not uncommon in a pulmonology practice, but if you incorrectly tally the history, exam, and medical decision-making (MDM), you will miss out on the higher level codes you could report.The third element for the historical portion of an E/M service, after the chief complaint (CC) and the history of the present illness (HPI), is the review of systems (ROS) -- this portion of the E/M service trips up many coders because often they must select a lower code simply because the provider didn't document pertinent negative responses or inappropriately used the statement "all systems negative."Ensure you're properly counting your pulmonologist's ROS with this tips to guarantee you're not overcoding or undercoding his E/M services.Differentiate ROS Levels"The review of systems is a subjective account of a patient's current and or past experiences with illnesses and or injuries affecting [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Pulmonology Coding Alert

View All