Radiology Coding Alert

ICD-9 Coding:

Get Back to Basics With 3 Backache Examples

Set your sights beyond 724.5 -- sometimes. Your interventional radiologist may be seeing more patients complaining of chronic pain. Trouble arises when you don't see documentation of a definitive diagnosis for the visit. You know better than to alter or guess a diagnosis to ensure payment; now learn about appropriate codes that can help you handle the situation. Clue In to Why Specificity Matters Specificity in diagnosis coding is always important, but it is increasingly vital because "third party payers are establishing more stringent coverage criteria for therapies and procedures and are using automated edits to deny claims based on the lack of a covered diagnosis," says Mary H. McDermott, MBA, CPC, with Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore. "Using a non-specific diagnosis code which may be 'close' -- but not exact -- may mean you won't be paid for a service due to a Medicare Local Coverage Determination [LCD] or a third-party medical [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Radiology Coding Alert

View All