Urology Coding Alert
Reader Question:
Quackel Leads to 54430
Published on Sun May 13, 2012
Question: Oregon Subscriber Answer: Tip:
Other Articles in this issue of
Urology Coding Alert
- Biofeedback Billing:
90901/90911: Take Control of Your Biofeedback Coding With 5 Expert Tips
Key: Pay attention to payer-specific rules. With only two codes to choose from when your [...] - ICD-10:
CMS Proposes One-Year ICD-10 Delay
Don't miss: New date isn't yet set in stone. Practices have been wondering how to [...] - Correction:
In the April 2012, Vol. 14, No. 4 issue of Urology Coding Alert the "You [...] - Documentation:
81001 or 81003? The Order May Clinch the Auditor's Decision
Plus: 2 tactics help keep tech troubles from derailing your coding.To be sure your documentation [...] - Code This!:
Complicated Ureteral-Ileal Anastomosis With Existing Loop
How would you report this procedure?Test your operative report interpretation skills with this case study [...] - Billing Spotlight:
Do These Top 10 Errors Look Familiar? Find Out How to Easily Improve Your Claim Error Rate
Hint: Benefits verification can solve a lot of your denial problems.What's the top tool in [...] - You Be the Coder:
When Can You Add 38780?
Question: If my urologist does a radical nephrectomy with a retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, does [...] - Reader Question:
99499 May Be Your Only No-Intervention Pay Option
Question: My urologist was called to the hospital to see a patient for a consultation. [...] - Reader Question:
Quackel Leads to 54430
Question: My urologist documented that he performed a "proximal cavernosal-spongiosum shunt (Quackel shunt)." How should [...]
View All
