Advanced Search

Urology Coding Alert

Reader Questions :

Consider 12001 Inherent to Implant Procedure

Published on Wed Jun 17, 2009

Question: One of my providers and I are having a debate. Can he bill CPT 11981 -11983 and 12001 at the same time? Oregon Subscriber Answer: A clinical scenario for which you code using both non-biodegradable drug delivery implant procedure codes 11981-11983 and 12001 (Simple repair of superficial wounds of scalp, neck, axillae, external genitalia, trunk and/or extremities [including hands and feet]; 2.5 cm or less) would indeed be rare, unless there is a laceration unrelated to the implant that needs repair. In that case you could bill both codes. Typically, however, you should consider the closure of the incision for the implant an integral part of the procedure itself. Therefore, although these codes are not bundled, you should consider the 12001 a non-billable service that is included in the delivery implant procedure.
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Urology Coding Alert

View All