Urology Coding Alert

Reader Questions:

Determine Codes Radiotherapist Is Reporting

Question: Our radiation oncologist asked our urologist to perform a cystoscopy after he placed seeds. Is this something we can be reimbursed for?

Florida Subscriber

Answer: If the radiotherapist is performing the complete procedure and seed implantation without the help of the urologist, you most likely won't be able to report the cystoscopy.
 
You need to determine if the radiotherapist is billing 55859 (Transperineal placement of needles or catheters into prostate for interstitial radioelement application, with or without cystoscopy) with the other services he's reporting. If he is, you'll have a problem getting payment for a cystoscopy. This is because code 55859 also includes a cystoscopy and seed removal, as determined by the American Urological Association.
 
If the radiotherapist does not include code 55859 in his billing for the seed implantation, however, you should be able to report and be reimbursed for a cystoscopic examination. You should report 52000 (Cystourethroscopy [separate procedure]) for this service.
 
Bonus: If the urologist performed the procedure to remove a displaced seed, you could also report 52310 (Cystourethroscopy, with removal of foreign body, calculus, or ureteral stent from urethra or bladder [separate procedure]; simple).
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Urology Coding Alert

View All