Wiki HELP PLEASE!!!!

dsibley67

Contributor
Messages
20
Best answers
0
I need help coding this please!!! I coded it 63047 & 63048 and the office coded it 63047 & 63030 - 59 LT. I didn't think you could code both of these codes if it was done on the same level. Please help!! This is the op note:
POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES: L4-5 disc herniation with stenosis and
radiculopathy.
PROCEDURES PERFORMED: 1. Partial bilateral L4 and L5 laminectomy.
2. Left L4-5 microdiscectomy

PROCEDURE IN DETAIL: The patient was brought to the operating suite. She was placed under
general anesthesia and intubated without complication. She was turned to the prone position on a
radiolucent bed with a Wilson frame. All prominences were padded to prevent neuropraxia. We took an official time-out to verify the correct patient, level and procedure to be performed. We then sterile
prepped and draped her lumbar spine in a normal fashion.
I began by using a spinal needle and C-arm imaging to center my incision over the L4-5 interspace. The
skin was then anesthetized in the midline and sharply incised. Bovie cautery was used for hemostasis and
to perform a subperiosteal dissection onto the spinous processes and lamina bilaterally at L4 and L5. A
self-retaining retractor was then utilized. Again, I used C-arm imaging to verify I was centered over the
appropriate motion segment. Given her disc herniation was central, I felt it necessary to perform a wide
decompression bilaterally. I therefore used a rongeur to remove the interspinous ligaments at L4-L5. I
then used a bone scalpel to remove the lower one half of the lamina at L4 bilaterally as well as the apex of
the L5 lamina. Once the section of the bone were removed, I could identify the thecal sac in the midline.
I then worked in lateral recess and removed hypertrophic ligamentum onto the medial border of the
pedicles. I could then palpate the medial border of the pedicles bilaterally and verified the foramen were
decompressed. Any attempt to work in lateral recess showed ongoing nerve irritation secondary to the
disc herniation.
I then brought a microscope in from the left side of the patient, I diligently worked to retract the dura and
was able to identify the central disc herniation with the dura protected. I used a scalpel to perform an
annulotomy. I could then use a nerve hook to work in the disc herniation. This was quite hard and
seemed chronic. I was able to express some small fragments of acute/soft disc herniation, but this was
completed. The nerve roots were completely decompressed in the lateral recess. There was still some
disc protrusion centrally which was able to be removed secondary to risk of nerve retraction.
I copiously irrigated the epidural space. No signs of CSF leak was noted throughout. I obtained epidural
venous hemostasis with injectable thrombin product and bipolar cautery. The retractor and microscope
were removed. No further bleeding was noted and I did not utilize the drain. We injected the tissues with
BKK for postoperative pain control. The fascia was closed with interrupted 0-Vicryl suture and the skin
in layers with subcuticular Monocryl for the surface. A soft sterile dressing was placed. She tolerated the
procedure well without apparent consultation. She was returned to the supine position, awoke from
anesthesia and was extubated. She was taken to Recovery in stable condition.
PLAN: Ms. Hensley will be monitored in the Recovery Unit once the PACU criteria are met. She will
be discharged to home with close followup in my clinic.

Thanks in advance.
 
If it's done at the same level you can only report one. The intent of the procedure and diagnosis would drive the CPT choice.

This explains well: https://www.elevatecoding.com/blog-posts/surgical-lumbar-decompression

Other info: https://karenzupko.com/counting-laminectomy-levels/

See CMS NCCI manual: https://www.cms.gov/files/document/medicare-ncci-policy-manual-2023-chapter-8.pdf
18. A laminectomy includes excision of all the posterior vertebral components, and a laminotomy includes partial excision of posterior vertebral components. Since a laminectomy is a more extensive procedure than a laminotomy, a laminotomy code shall not be reported with a laminectomy code for the same vertebra. CPT codes 22100-22103 (partial excision of posterior vertebral component (e.g., spinous process, lamina, or facet) for intrinsic bony lesion) are not separately reportable with laminectomy or laminotomy procedures for the same vertebra.

 
If it's done at the same level you can only report one. The intent of the procedure and diagnosis would drive the CPT choice.

This explains well: https://www.elevatecoding.com/blog-posts/surgical-lumbar-decompression

Other info: https://karenzupko.com/counting-laminectomy-levels/

See CMS NCCI manual: https://www.cms.gov/files/document/medicare-ncci-policy-manual-2023-chapter-8.pdf
18. A laminectomy includes excision of all the posterior vertebral components, and a laminotomy includes partial excision of posterior vertebral components. Since a laminectomy is a more extensive procedure than a laminotomy, a laminotomy code shall not be reported with a laminectomy code for the same vertebra. CPT codes 22100-22103 (partial excision of posterior vertebral component (e.g., spinous process, lamina, or facet) for intrinsic bony lesion) are not separately reportable with laminectomy or laminotomy procedures for the same vertebra.

Thank you so much for answering my question and the links you provided! This explains it to where you can understand. Thanks again!
 
Top