Cardiology Coding Alert

Clarifications/Differing Opinions/Corrections

HPSA Clarification

In the February 1999 issue of CCA (page 13), we urged readers to check their HPSA status to find out if they were eligible for a 10 percent incentive bonus for services provided in a healthcare shortage area.

But we did not remind you to get your Medicare carrier to clarify whether you are in a geographic HPSA or a population HPSA, points out Ron Nelson, president, HSA Consulting Group in Freemont, MI, and advisor to the American Academy of Physician Assistants.

While the differences between these two classifications are too detailed to explain here, the important point for coders is that a population HPSA is not eligible for a bonus payment, he explains. However, Medicare may inadvertently pay if you add the QU or QB modifier. But eventually they will discover their mistake and then practices will have to pay back the overpayment.

Nelson knows of several of these situations. So the precise question our readers need to ask the Medicare carrier is: Do we provide service in a geographic HPSA?

Dealing with Dump Codes

Steve Hunt, business office supervisor for the Portland (OR) Cardiovascular Institute, called to discuss the dump code insert mailed separately from the January 1999 issue of CCA. (The list was compiled from the AMA CPT manual, which flags dump codesunspecified codeswith yellow caution signs.)

What advice should we be giving to our physicians about these dump codes? he asks. Should they not be using them?

Dump codes are not the same as linking codes (codes that support medical necessity), yet they may cause claims to be rejected because they are non-specific or ill defined. Use them as a last resort after youve checked all other options; dont just default to them out of habit.

For example, 401.9 (unspecified essential hypertension) is a dump code that cardiologists may be tempted to use much too often. But you can use your superbill to reduce that tendency by listing the specified diagnostic codes first, 401.0 (malignant) and 401.1 (benign) and then listing 401.9 (unspecified). Hopefully, the physician will select one of the more specific ones because he or she sees it first. When you change the superbill, be sure to follow up with a memo to the physicians reminding them not to use a dump code by default.

Correction Regarding Modifier -59

In the November 1998 issue of CCA (page 12), we reported incorrectly that, in some circumstances, when an EKG and a stress test are performed on the same day, you should attach modifier -59 to the stress test to be reimbursed for both procedures. (Modifier -59, which first appeared in the 1997 edition of CPT, is used to identify procedures and/or services not normally reported together, but under certain circumstances are separately [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more