Gastroenterology Coding Alert

You Be the Coder:

Get Your Modifiers Straight When Physicians Double Up on PEG Tube

Question: We recently hired a practice consultant who advised us that we are coding our PEG tube placements incorrectly. The gastroenterologist performs the EGD while the general surgeon works at the PEG. The physicians dictate separate procedure reports. We have always used a co-surgery modifier, but our consultant says that Medicare only recognizes this as an assistant surgeon procedure. She offered the option of one physician performing and dictating an EGD while the other reports the PEG tube placement. We have asked other practices and the AAPC and they disagree with the consultant and say we were coding correctly all along. How should we code this? New Jersey Subscriber Answer: Both physicians should report 43246-62 (Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy including ophagus, stomach, and either the duodenum and/or jejunum as appropriate; with directed placement of percutaneous gastrostomy tube). You append modifier 62 (Two surgeons) when two physicians work together on the same [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Gastroenterology Coding Alert

View All