Orthopedic Coding Alert

Reader Questions:

Discover When You Should Apply Modifier 99

Question: I have been reporting the following code sequence: - 73562-26 - 73562-99 (in the first modifier position, followed by 26, 59, RT, or LT in the miscellaneous text). I have been receiving denials from 10/01/08 onward. What am I missing? Rhode Island Subscriber Answer: You should not have an issue reporting 73562-26 (Radiologic examination, knee; 3 views; Professional services) twice. You may not, however, need to place modifier 99 (Multiple modifiers) onto the second code. You list three modifiers -- 26 59 (Distinct procedural service), RT/LT (Right side; or Left side), which can all fit on the line. Remember: Modifier 99 comes into play when there are not enough spaces (in your system or the carrier-s) to hold all modifiers associated with the procedure. Most systems can accommodate at least two or three modifiers. If a claims requires more than three modifiers, list the actual modifiers in block 19 [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Orthopedic Coding Alert

View All