Otolaryngology Coding Alert

Should You Appeal Medicare's E/M-69210 Bundles?

You deserve pay when the encounter meets 5 criteria Thanks to CMS' reporting guidelines, you no longer have to wonder whether you should fight 9921x-25/cerumen-removal denials.
 
The problem: Medicare consistently denies an office visit with cerumen removal. Cindy Bryant, a claims administrator at Family Practice Specialists in Glennville, Ga.,  says that even when she has a separate diagnosis and uses modifier -25 (Significant, separately identifiable evaluation and management service by the same physician on the same day of the procedure or other service), Medicare bundles the E/M service into 69210 (Removal impacted cerumen [separate procedure], one or both ears).

 When this happens to you, should you waste your time on an appeal? Coding experts say you should demand payment when your claim meets these CMS criteria: 1. E/M Is for a Different Reason You should first verify whether the E/M visit is for anything other than cerumen removal, says Barbara Cobuzzi, MBA, CPC, CPC-H, an otolaryngology coding and reimbursement specialist and president of Cash Flow Solutions, a medical billing firm in Brick, N.J. CMS won't pay for an encounter in which the visit's intent and only documentation is for cerumen removal.
 
Example: A family physician (FP) refers a patient to an otolaryngologist for unilateral cerumen removal. The specialist looks in the patient's ear, sees impacted cerumen and removes it. In this case, bill the cerumen removal (69210) only, Cobuzzi says. Because the otolaryngologist didn't perform or document anything else, you can't support a separate E/M service. 2. ENT Performs Unrelated Service
 
You can, however, bill an office visit (99201-99215, Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of a new or established patient ...) or consultation (99241-99245, Office consultation for a new or established patient ...) when your otolaryngologist performs an unrelated patient encounter or the patient complains about his ears.
 
For instance, a patient presents with wheezing (786.07) and a fever (780.6) and also complains that he can't hear well. The otolaryngologist performs a level-three history, examination and medical decision-making, diagnoses the patient with an upper-respiratory infection (URI) and removes impacted cerumen.
 
In this case, you should bill both the service and the procedure. Here's how:

 1. Report the service that led to the URI diagnosis with the appropriate-level E/M, such as 99201-99215.
 2. Append modifier -25 to indicate that the service is a significant, separately identifiable service (meets CMS' fifth criteria, see section 5).
 3. Bill cerumen removal with 69210.
 4. Link the E/M to the URI diagnosis (465.9, Acute upper respiratory infections of multiple or unspecified sites; unspecified site), and the [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Otolaryngology Coding Alert

View All