Radiology Coding Alert

Rules and Regulations:

Know What Fraud and Abuse Looks Like With This Guide

Pinpoint the difference using example scenarios.

Sticking to the coding guidelines and policies in place can get you far as a coder, but it doesn’t keep you completely out of the woods when it comes to risks of committing fraud or abuse. Understanding what constitutes fraud and abuse — along with differentiating the two — is an important component of being the best coder you can be. 

With federal enforcement activity zeroing in on the fraudsters and abusers, there’s no better time to refresh your knowledge of the subject.

Dive in for a crash course that will cover all the essentials on Medicare fraud and abuse.

What Constitutes Medicare Fraud?

Though we often throw fraud and abuse into the same category, they are different. “Fraud occurs when someone intentionally falsifies information in an effort to deceive Medicare,” explains Gail O’Leary, consultant with Part B Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) NGS Medicare in the recent webinar, “Medicare Fraud and Abuse.”

When a provider bills for a service he or she never performed or certifies that care is medically necessary — when it’s not — that’s fraud. This kind of bucking the system is purposeful and done with the full intent and knowledge of the perpetrator. However, it’s important to remember that not all fraudsters are clinicians. Patients, staff members, and business partners defraud Medicare, too.

“Fraud schemes range from solo ventures to broad-based operations by an institution or a group” says O’Leary. “Even organized crime has infiltrated the Medicare program and masqueraded as Medicare providers and suppliers.”

Fraud varieties: There are several types of fraud that the feds look for that go beyond lying about medical necessity or billing for care that was never rendered. Those include the following examples from the NGS materials:

  • Revise documentation to receive a higher payout.
  • Send duplicate bills on purpose.
  • Facilitate a kickback scheme.
  • “Misrepresent” administered services.
  • Bill noncovered services as covered services.
  • Put Medicare as the secondary payer when there is no primary.
  • Usurp other patients’ Medicare Beneficiary Identifiers and engage in identity theft.
  • Violate the Conditions of Participation knowingly.
  • Set up a scheme between the provider and beneficiary to split Medicare payments.

Gang visits: Medicare fraud often involves taking advantage of the nation’s most vulnerable populations, and that’s where “gang visits” come in. “Providers visit a nursing home and bill for services as if they provided them for a majority of the residents when they really didn’t — or perform a service regardless of whether or not the resident needed it. That’s what they’re talking about when they say ‘gang visits,’” explains O’Leary.

Here’s How Abuse Is Different Than Fraud

Abuse varies from fraud and deals more heavily with the coding and billing side of Medicare. Abusers try to get around the claims rules, and whether they intend to, impact improper payments and the costs of services under Medicare.

Important: You may not think Medicare abuse is as serious as Medicare fraud, but “inappropriate practices that begin as abuse can quickly evolve into fraud,” O’Leary warns.

Top abuse scenarios, according to NGS, include:

  • Unbundling codes to receive higher payments on Medicare claims.
  • Upcoding to higher-level codes that include higher Medicare payments.
  • Incorrectly coding claims that aren’t supported by the documentation.
  • Sending claims to Medicare first instead of the primary payer.
  • Excessively charging patients for services and supplies.
  • Ignoring rules about deductible waivers, advance beneficiary notices (ABNs), and more.
  • Violating “Medicare participation agreements” that relate to supplier standards.

Example: Unbundling is a real problem for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and is something the MACs are on the lookout for, O’Leary suggests. Unbundling “occurs when a provider submits separate bills for ancillary services that combine two or more tests which are intended to be billed as one service,” she says.

As a result of those separated bills, “Medicare pays more for each service than if that service were billed as a group [as it was meant to be]. That is unbundling,” O’Leary adds.

Resource: Review more CMS guidance on fraud and abuse at  www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/Downloads/Fraud-Abuse-MLN4649244.pdf.