Urology Coding Alert

Case Study:

Mind Your Modifiers When Your Urologist Works With Another Doctor

Automatically appending modifier 52 could be costing you hundreds. When your urologist works with another physician during a procedure, you may face major coding challenges. If you don’t coordinate your coding with the other physician’s coder, both doctors could lose money and face audits. Learn how to correctly code for these shared procedures with this real-world case study.   Review the Surgical Case   Scenario: A urologist and a general surgeon performed surgery on a patient. The urologist did an orchiopexy and performed the opening and closing. The general surgeon performed an inguinal hernia repair. Coding dilemma: Betsie Ortiz, CPC, professional fee coordinator and charge capture surgery team lead at University of Washington Physicians urology department in Seattle, who presented this case study, wonders which codes each physician should report, and which modifiers coders should append.   No Bundle Means 2 Codes   CPT and the Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Urology Coding Alert

View All