Otolaryngology Coding Alert

Case Study:

3 Examples Show You How to Maximize Tube Removals

Tympanic repair will call for separate procedure coding Although you-ll generally include tube removal as a part of any E/M office visit the physician provides on the same date of service, you should be on the lookout for circumstances that will allow you to report separate services. Keep reading for three instances in which tube removal demands coding above and beyond a simple E/M service. Bundle Removal to E/M--Usually In most cases, you should consider ear tube removal to be a component of any E/M service the ENT provides during the same visit.

Assign E/M with caution: Remember, however, that an E/M service includes three key components: history, exam and medical-decision making. If the ENT merely removes the tubes (which can take only seconds) and medical necessity does not require a separate history and/or exam, documentation may not support even the lowest-level E/M service, says Barbara J. Cobuzzi, MBA, CPC, CPC-H, CHBME, president of CRN Healthcare Solutions, a coding and reimbursement consulting firm in Tinton Falls, N.J. (Remember, you need two out of three key components to support a given level of service for an established patient, and three out of three key components to support a given service level for a new patient.)

What NOT to do: For in-office ventilating tube removal, you should never report 69799 (Unlisted procedure, middle ear). Likewise, you should not report 69424 (Ventilating tube removal requiring general anesthesia) with modifier 52 (Reduced services) appended. If removing the ventilating tubes does not require a return to the OR with anesthesia, 69424 is never appropriate, Cobuzzi says. Case 1: Tympanic Repair If the ENT must perform a tympanic repair (or so-called -paper patch-) as a result of the tube removal, you may report this procedure separately using 69610 (Tympanic membrane repair, with or without site preparation of perforation for closure, with or without patch), Cobuzzi says.

If you report 69610, you would not likely report an E/M code in addition unless your ENT documents a significant and separately identifiable E/M service. If documentation supports such a service, however, be sure to append modifier 25 (Significant, separately identifiable E/M service by the same physician on the same day of the procedure or other service) to the appropriate E/M service code.
  
Case 2: Microscope Use If the ENT must use a binocular microscope to aid in tube removal, you may report 92504 (Binocular microscopy [separate diagnostic procedure]).

Remember: Because 92504 is a -separate procedure,- you may only report it if the ENT does not perform any other procedures at the same time, Cobuzzi says.

Example: You shouldn't report 92504 with G0268 (Removal of impacted cerumen [one or both ears] by physician on the same date of service as audiologic function testing), for instance, if [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Otolaryngology Coding Alert

View All