Otolaryngology Coding Alert

Why 'Unrelated' Might Not Mean What You Think It Means

Don't treat every infection as related to surgery, at least for private payers Before deciding whether you should separately report postoperative wound care during the global period of another procedure, you must first decide whether the reason for the surgery and the reason for the postoperative care are the same.

A sidebar feature in the March 2006 Otolaryngology Coding Alert, -Turn to 24 for Unrelated E/M Services-, generated many reader responses questioning what, exactly, makes a postoperative complication -unrelated- to a previous surgery.

For instance: A Michigan subscriber said, -You should not report modifier 24 [Unrelated evaluation and management service by the same physician during a postoperative period] for postoperative visits for postsurgical infection. You should use modifier 24 only for services that are not related to the surgery- [emphasis in original].
 
The reader goes on to say, -Asking -Would this patient have a postsurgical infection if he had not had the surgery?- should make it very clear that postoperative wound infection is not an unrelated service.-

Ask the right questions: Our experts agree that you should only append modifier 24 to report E/M services unrelated to the previous surgery. But they note that asking -Would this patient have a postsurgical infection if he had not had the surgery?- is not sufficient to make such a determination. Don't Automatically Link Infections to Surgery -Although some complications might truly be said to be related to the surgery, like an instrument left in the surgical site or failure to achieve hemostasis before closing, most post-op complications are more closely related to issues such as the patient's general health, compliance with postoperative care instructions, and exposure to infectious organisms,- says Marcella Bucknam, CPC, CCS-P, CPC-H, HIM program coordinator at Clarkson College in Omaha, Neb. -For this reason, I use modifier 24 to describe E/M services for post-op complications in non-Medicare patients.-

She further says that some insurers specifically direct practices to use modifier 24 in this way.

Another factor to consider, Bucknam says, is whether you can be sure that a postoperative infection can really be attributed to surgery. -Patients who are unhealthy, unclean, or who fail to follow medical instructions as to medication, dressing changes, etc., could certainly develop abscesses, ulcerations, hematomas, infections and other common postsurgical complications even without the surgery,- she says. This further validates the decision to treat postsurgical infections as unrelated to the previous surgery. Different Diagnoses Denote Different Problems Because the reason for the initial surgery and the reason for postoperative care are different (that is, they require different diagnoses), they qualify as distinct.

-The initial surgery and postoperative infection care would have different diagnosis codes, so that justifies the use of modifier 24 as -unrelated,- - says Eric Sandhusen, CHC, CPC, director [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Otolaryngology Coding Alert

View All