Advanced Search

Otolaryngology Coding Alert

Modifier:

Two Surgeons, One Procedure, Distinct Portions: Modifier 62 Provides Your Solution

Published on Fri Sep 09, 2011

Fail to report the same CPT®, modifier for both surgeons, and you waste $2K.Don't mess up your multi-provider coding by assigning the wrong modifier(s). Modifiers can be a friend or a foe, depending on how you use them -- or when you use them.Scenario: The otolaryngologist performs the approach for an orthopedist who does a spinal osteotomy with neck exploration. The case of two surgeons calls for the use of a modifier, but which one?The main key in a multi-provider scenario is to treat each physician's work as a separate activity. However, deciding when to report a case as co-surgery, assistant surgery -- or something else -- has more to it than meets the eye. Find out with these frequently asked questions.1. What Distinct Roles Do Modifiers 62, 80, 81, 82 Play?You know that a modifier is at hand in this case, but more importantly you should be able to tell what role [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Otolaryngology Coding Alert

View All